Xeon 6710E vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Xeon 6710E
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6710E
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon 6710E | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($344) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($368) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Sierra Forest (2024) / Intel 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon 6710E | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+6%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($344) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($368) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6710E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Xeon 6710E
The Xeon 6710E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 61,404 points. Launch price was $2,749.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-07-14. It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,261 points. Launch price was $4,499.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6710E packs 64 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon 6710E has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 6710E versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX — a 27% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon 6710E uses the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6710E scores 61,404 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX's 62,261 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,225 vs 1,260, a 2.8% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,400 vs 25,211 (83.2% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). L3 cache: 96 MB (total) on the Xeon 6710E vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
| Feature | Xeon 6710E | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 64+100% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz+31% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz+46% |
| L3 Cache | 96 MB (total) | 128 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (per module)+700% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-57% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Sierra Forest (2024) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 61,404 | 62,261+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 42,986 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,225 | 1,260+3% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,400 | 25,211+142% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6710E uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Xeon 6710E versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX — the Xeon 6710E supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6710E supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6710E) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon 6710E) and AMD WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX).
| Feature | Xeon 6710E | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+100% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 88 | 128+45% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6710E supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6710E) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). Primary use case: Xeon 6710E targets High Efficiency Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6710E rivals EPYC 9534; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX rivals Xeon W-3375.
| Feature | Xeon 6710E | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | High Efficiency Server | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon 6710E launched at $1565 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX debuted at $1337. At current prices ($344 vs $368), the Xeon 6710E is $24 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6710E delivers 178.5 pts/$ vs 169.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX — making the Xeon 6710E the 5.4% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6710E | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1565 | $1337-15% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $344-7% | $368 |
| Performance per Dollar | 178.5+5% | 169.2 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon 6710E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
