PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 6710E vs Xeon Gold 5512U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 6710E vs Xeon Gold 5512U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 6710E

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.2 vs 49.1 PassMark/$ ($1,565 MSRP vs $1,230 MSRP).

Xeon Gold 5512U

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $335 less on MSRP ($1,230 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
✅Delivers 25.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.1 vs 39.2 PassMark/$ ($1,230 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
✅Draws 185W instead of 205W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6710E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (60,367 vs 61,404).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6710E better than Xeon Gold 5512U?

Yes. Xeon 6710E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6710E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 96 MB versus 53 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6710E is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 82.9% larger total L3 cache (96 MB vs 53 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6710E is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 5512U is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon 6710E comes in 27.2% more expensive on MSRP at $1,565 MSRP versus $1,230 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Gold 5512U is also 25.1% better value on MSRP (49.1 vs 39.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6710E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), 3D V-Cache and a much larger 96 MB L3 cache instead of 53 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 64 threads instead of 28/56. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon 6710E vs Xeon Gold 5512U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6710E

The Xeon 6710E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 61,404 points. Launch price was $2,749.

Xeon Gold 5512U

The Xeon Gold 5512U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 60,367 points. Launch price was $1,230.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6710E packs 64 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5512U offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon 6710E has 36 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 6710E versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5512U — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5512U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon 6710E uses the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5512U uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6710E scores 61,404 against the Xeon Gold 5512U's 60,367 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon 6710E. L3 cache: 96 MB (total) on the Xeon 6710E vs 52.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5512U.

Feature	Xeon 6710E	Xeon Gold 5512U
Cores / Threads	64 / 64+129%	28 / 56
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.7 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+14%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	96 MB (total)+83%	52.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (per module)+100%	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 3 nm-57%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Sierra Forest (2024)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	61,404+2%	60,367
Geekbench 6 Single	1,225	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,400	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6710E uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5512U uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Xeon 6710E versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 5512U — the Xeon 6710E supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6710E) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 5512U) — the Xeon 6710E offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon 6710E) and C741 (Xeon Gold 5512U).

Feature	Xeon 6710E	Xeon Gold 5512U
Socket	LGA4710	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+17%	4800
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	88+10%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6710E targets High Efficiency Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6710E rivals EPYC 9534; Xeon Gold 5512U rivals EPYC 9354.

Feature	Xeon 6710E	Xeon Gold 5512U
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	High Efficiency Server	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon 6710E was priced at $1565, while the Xeon Gold 5512U came in at $1230. On launch pricing ($1565 vs $1230), Xeon Gold 5512U was $335 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6710E delivers 39.2 pts/$ vs 49.1 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5512U — making the Xeon Gold 5512U the 22.3% better value option.

Feature	Xeon 6710E	Xeon Gold 5512U
MSRP	$1565	$1230-21%
Performance per Dollar	39.2	49.1+25%
Release Date	2024	2023

Search Xeon 6710E on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 5512U on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.