
Xeon 6737P vs EPYC 7C13

Xeon 6737P

EPYC 7C13
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6737P
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7C13
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon 6737P | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,995) | ✅ More affordable ($2,000) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon 6737P | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+139%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,995) | ✅ More affordable ($2,000) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6737P and EPYC 7C13

Xeon 6737P
The Xeon 6737P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 79,634 points. Launch price was $4,995.

EPYC 7C13
The EPYC 7C13 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2021-03-01. It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 76,363 points. Launch price was $5,000.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6737P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 7C13 offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 7C13 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon 6737P versus 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7C13 — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Xeon 6737P (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon 6737P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the EPYC 7C13 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6737P scores 79,634 against the EPYC 7C13's 76,363 — a 4.2% lead for the Xeon 6737P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,000 vs 1,538, a 26.1% lead for the Xeon 6737P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 45,000 vs 37,000 (19.5% advantage for the Xeon 6737P). L3 cache: 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6737P vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7C13.
| Feature | Xeon 6737P | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 64 / 128+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+9% | 3.68 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+45% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 144 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+78% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-57% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 79,634+4% | 76,363 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,000+30% | 1,538 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 45,000+22% | 37,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6737P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7C13 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6737P versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7C13 — the Xeon 6737P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6737P) vs 128 (EPYC 7C13) — the EPYC 7C13 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon 6737P) and SP3 (EPYC 7C13).
| Feature | Xeon 6737P | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 88 | 128+45% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6737P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6737P) vs AMD-V (EPYC 7C13). Primary use case: Xeon 6737P targets High Performance Server, EPYC 7C13 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6737P rivals EPYC 9005; EPYC 7C13 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | Xeon 6737P | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High Performance Server | Enterprise Server |
Value Analysis
The Xeon 6737P launched at $4995 MSRP, while the EPYC 7C13 debuted at $2000. At current prices ($4995 vs $2000), the EPYC 7C13 is $2995 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6737P delivers 15.9 pts/$ vs 38.2 pts/$ for the EPYC 7C13 — making the EPYC 7C13 the 82.2% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6737P | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4995 | $2000-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4995 | $2000-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.9 | 38.2+140% |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















