PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 6737P vs Xeon Max 9480 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 6737P vs Xeon Max 9480: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 6737P

2025

Why buy it

✅+5.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+28% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 113 MB).
✅Costs $7,985 less on MSRP ($4,995 MSRP vs $12,980 MSRP).
✅Delivers 149.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.9 vs 6.4 PassMark/$ ($4,995 MSRP vs $12,980 MSRP).
✅Draws 270W instead of 350W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (45,000 vs 55,000).

Xeon Max 9480

2023

Why buy it

✅+22.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,900 vs 2,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (113 MB vs 144 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($12,980 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
❌29.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 270W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6737P better than Xeon Max 9480?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon 6737P is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Max 9480 pulls ahead with 22.2% better Geekbench multi-core. Xeon 6737P also has the bigger cache pool with 28% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 113 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Max 9480 is the stronger fit. You are getting 22.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 56 cores and 112 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6737P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6737P comes in $7,985 cheaper on MSRP at $4,995 MSRP versus $12,980 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Max 9480 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 22.2% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 149.6% better value on MSRP (15.9 vs 6.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6737P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023) and 28% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 113 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon 6737P vs Xeon Max 9480 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6737P

The Xeon 6737P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 79,634 points. Launch price was $4,995.

Xeon Max 9480

The Xeon Max 9480 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,913 points. Launch price was $12,980.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6737P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Max 9480 offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Xeon Max 9480 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon 6737P versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Max 9480 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Xeon 6737P (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Xeon 6737P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon Max 9480 uses Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6737P scores 79,634 against the Xeon Max 9480's 82,913 — a 4% lead for the Xeon Max 9480. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,000 vs 1,900, a 5.1% lead for the Xeon 6737P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 45,000 vs 55,000 (20% advantage for the Xeon Max 9480). L3 cache: 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6737P vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon Max 9480.

Feature	Xeon 6737P	Xeon Max 9480
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	56 / 112+75%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+14%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+53%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	144 MB (total)+28%	112.5 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 3 nm-70%	10 nm
Architecture	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)	Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023)
PassMark	79,634	82,913+4%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,000+5%	1,900
Geekbench 6 Multi	45,000	55,000+22%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6737P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Max 9480 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6737P versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Max 9480 — the Xeon 6737P supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6737P) vs 80 (Xeon Max 9480) — the Xeon 6737P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon 6737P) and C741 (Xeon Max 9480).

Feature	Xeon 6737P	Xeon Max 9480
Socket	LGA4710	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400+33%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	88+10%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6737P targets High Performance Server, Xeon Max 9480 targets HPC Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6737P rivals EPYC 9005; Xeon Max 9480 rivals EPYC 9684X.

Feature	Xeon 6737P	Xeon Max 9480
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	High Performance Server	HPC Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon 6737P was priced at $4995, while the Xeon Max 9480 came in at $12980. On launch pricing ($4995 vs $12980), Xeon 6737P was $7985 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6737P delivers 15.9 pts/$ vs 6.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Max 9480 — making the Xeon 6737P the 85.6% better value option.

Feature	Xeon 6737P	Xeon Max 9480
MSRP	$4995-62%	$12980
Performance per Dollar	15.9+148%	6.4
Release Date	2025	2023

Search Xeon 6737P on Amazon

Search Xeon Max 9480 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.