Xeon 6737P vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+

Intel

Xeon 6737P

32 Cores64 Thrd270 WWMax: 4 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+

48 Cores96 Thrd350 WWMax: 4 GHz2023

Xeon 6737P vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 6737P vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 6737P vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 6737P

2025

Why buy it

  • βœ…+2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
  • βœ…Costs $1,502 less on MSRP ($4,995 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 30.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.9 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($4,995 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 270W instead of 350W, a 80W reduction.
  • βœ…10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (45,000 vs 55,000).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (144 MB vs 300 MB).

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+

2023

Why buy it

  • βœ…+22.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
  • βœ…+108.3% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 144 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,961 vs 2,000).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
  • ❌29.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 270W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6737P better than Xeon Platinum 8568Y+?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon 6737P is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ pulls ahead with 22.2% better Geekbench multi-core. Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ also has the bigger cache pool with 108.3% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 144 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 22.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 108.3% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 144 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon 6737P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6737P comes in $1,502 cheaper on MSRP at $4,995 MSRP versus $6,497 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 22.2% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 30.0% better value on MSRP (15.9 vs 12.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon 6737P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon 6737P vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon 6737P

The Xeon 6737P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024βˆ’2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 79,634 points. Launch price was $4,995.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+

The Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 79,683 points. Launch price was $6,497.

⚑

Processing Power

The Xeon 6737P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ offers 48 cores / 96 threads β€” the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon 6737P versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ β€” identical boost frequencies (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon 6737P uses the Granite Rapids (2024βˆ’2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6737P scores 79,634 against the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+'s 79,683 β€” a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+. Geekbench 6 single-core β€” the metric most relevant to gaming β€” records 2,000 vs 1,961, a 2% lead for the Xeon 6737P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 45,000 vs 55,000 (20% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+). L3 cache: 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6737P vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+.

FeatureXeon 6737PXeon Platinum 8568Y+
Cores / Threads
32 / 64
48 / 96+50%
Boost Clock
4 GHz
4 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+26%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
144 MB (total)
300 MB (total)+108%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 3 nm-70%
10 nm
Architecture
Granite Rapids (2024βˆ’2025)
Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark
79,634
79,683
Geekbench 6 Single
2,000+2%
1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi
45,000
55,000+22%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6737P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6737P versus DDR5-5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ β€” the Xeon 6737P supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6737P) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+) β€” the Xeon 6737P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon 6737P) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+).

FeatureXeon 6737PXeon Platinum 8568Y+
Socket
LGA4710
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400+14%
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB
4096 GB
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
88+10%
80
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6737P targets High Performance Server, Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6737P rivals EPYC 9005; Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ rivals EPYC 9554.

FeatureXeon 6737PXeon Platinum 8568Y+
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
High Performance Server
High Performance Server
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon 6737P was priced at $4995, while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ came in at $6497. On launch pricing ($4995 vs $6497), Xeon 6737P was $1502 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6737P delivers 15.9 pts/$ vs 12.3 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ β€” making the Xeon 6737P the 26.1% better value option.

FeatureXeon 6737PXeon Platinum 8568Y+
MSRP
$4995-23%
$6497
Performance per Dollar
15.9+29%
12.3
Release Date
2025
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.