Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Xeon 6737P

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

64 Cores128 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon 6737P

32 Cores64 Thrd270 WWMax: 4 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

2020

Why buy it

  • +77.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 144 MB).
  • 45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6737P across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (20,256 vs 45,000).
  • 9.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,489 MSRPvs$4,995 MSRP
  • Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon 6737P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Xeon 6737P

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +30.1% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $494 less on MSRP ($4,995 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
  • Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (144 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6737P better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX?
Yes. Xeon 6737P is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 30.1% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 122.2% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6737P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 30.1% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6737P is the better fit. You are getting 122.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon 6737P is the smarter buy today. Xeon 6737P is $494 cheaper on MSRP at $4,995 MSRP versus $5,489 MSRP, and it gives you a 30.1% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 5.1% better value on MSRP (15.9 vs 15.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon 6737P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8, more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 64/128, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen Threadripper PRO 3995WXXeon 6737P
1080p
low173 FPS190 FPS
medium142 FPS166 FPS
high121 FPS132 FPS
ultra97 FPS106 FPS
1440p
low152 FPS156 FPS
medium122 FPS132 FPS
high97 FPS101 FPS
ultra78 FPS83 FPS
4K
low71 FPS71 FPS
medium61 FPS63 FPS
high48 FPS49 FPS
ultra40 FPS40 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen Threadripper PRO 3995WXXeon 6737P
1080p
low571 FPS520 FPS
medium495 FPS460 FPS
high380 FPS376 FPS
ultra325 FPS309 FPS
1440p
low480 FPS425 FPS
medium423 FPS383 FPS
high336 FPS321 FPS
ultra272 FPS256 FPS
4K
low301 FPS262 FPS
medium269 FPS239 FPS
high230 FPS212 FPS
ultra201 FPS176 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen Threadripper PRO 3995WXXeon 6737P
1080p
low660 FPS883 FPS
medium546 FPS813 FPS
high481 FPS768 FPS
ultra412 FPS677 FPS
1440p
low555 FPS756 FPS
medium465 FPS692 FPS
high412 FPS650 FPS
ultra354 FPS581 FPS
4K
low406 FPS510 FPS
medium323 FPS429 FPS
high285 FPS383 FPS
ultra227 FPS318 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen Threadripper PRO 3995WXXeon 6737P
1080p
low909 FPS984 FPS
medium818 FPS886 FPS
high695 FPS766 FPS
ultra604 FPS665 FPS
1440p
low739 FPS805 FPS
medium643 FPS701 FPS
high545 FPS604 FPS
ultra463 FPS519 FPS
4K
low514 FPS581 FPS
medium461 FPS521 FPS
high407 FPS462 FPS
ultra346 FPS397 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and Xeon 6737P

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,235 points. Launch price was $5,500.

Intel

Xeon 6737P

The Xeon 6737P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 79,634 points. Launch price was $4,995.

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon 6737P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon 6737P — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6737P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX scores 83,235 against the Xeon 6737P's 79,634 — a 4.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,266 vs 2,000, a 44.9% lead for the Xeon 6737P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 20,256 vs 45,000 (75.8% advantage for the Xeon 6737P). L3 cache: 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6737P.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 3995WXXeon 6737P
Cores / Threads
64 / 128+100%
32 / 64
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+5%
4 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
2.9 GHz+7%
L3 Cache
256 MB+78%
144 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
2 MB (per core)+300%
Process
7 nm, 12 nm
Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture
Matisse (2019−2020)
Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark
83,235+5%
79,634
Cinebench R23 Multi
64,355
Geekbench 6 Single
1,266
2,000+58%
Geekbench 6 Multi
20,256
45,000+122%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6737P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6737P — the Xeon 6737P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6737P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) vs 88 (Xeon 6737P) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) and C741 (Xeon 6737P).

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 3995WXXeon 6737P
Socket
sWRX8
LGA4710
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
DDR5-6400+25%
Max RAM Capacity
2048 GB
4096 GB+100%
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+45%
88
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6737P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6737P). Primary use case: Xeon 6737P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Xeon 6737P rivals EPYC 9005.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 3995WXXeon 6737P
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
High Performance Server
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX launched at $5489 MSRP, while the Xeon 6737P debuted at $4995. On MSRP ($5489 vs $4995), the Xeon 6737P is $494 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX delivers 15.2 pts/$ vs 15.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6737P — making the Xeon 6737P the 5% better value option.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 3995WXXeon 6737P
MSRP
$5489
$4995-9%
Performance per Dollar
15.2
15.9+5%
Release Date
2020
2025