Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Xeon 6737P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Xeon 6737P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Xeon 6737P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Xeon 6737P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 144 MB).
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (20,256 vs 45,000).
- ❌9.9% HIGHER MSRP$5,489 MSRPvs$4,995 MSRP
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon 6737P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Xeon 6737P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+122.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Costs $494 less on MSRP ($4,995 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (144 MB vs 256 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6737P better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Xeon 6737P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,235 points. Launch price was $5,500.
Xeon 6737P
The Xeon 6737P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 79,634 points. Launch price was $4,995.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon 6737P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon 6737P — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6737P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX scores 83,235 against the Xeon 6737P's 79,634 — a 4.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,266 vs 2,000, a 44.9% lead for the Xeon 6737P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 20,256 vs 45,000 (75.8% advantage for the Xeon 6737P). L3 cache: 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6737P.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+100% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+5% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 2.9 GHz+7% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB+78% | 144 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 83,235+5% | 79,634 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 64,355 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,266 | 2,000+58% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,256 | 45,000+122% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6737P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6737P — the Xeon 6737P supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6737P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) vs 88 (Xeon 6737P) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) and C741 (Xeon 6737P).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 4096 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6737P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6737P). Primary use case: Xeon 6737P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Xeon 6737P rivals EPYC 9005.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | High Performance Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX was priced at $5489, while the Xeon 6737P came in at $4995. On launch pricing ($5489 vs $4995), Xeon 6737P was $494 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX delivers 15.2 pts/$ vs 15.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6737P — making the Xeon 6737P the 5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5489 | $4995-9% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.2 | 15.9+5% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and Xeon 6737P
