
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Popular choices:

Xeon 6737P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 144 MB).
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6737P across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (20,256 vs 45,000).
- ❌9.9% HIGHER MSRP$5,489 MSRPvs$4,995 MSRP
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon 6737P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Xeon 6737P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.1% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $494 less on MSRP ($4,995 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (144 MB vs 256 MB).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
2020Xeon 6737P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 144 MB).
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.1% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $494 less on MSRP ($4,995 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6737P across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (20,256 vs 45,000).
- ❌9.9% HIGHER MSRP$5,489 MSRPvs$4,995 MSRP
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon 6737P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (144 MB vs 256 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6737P better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 571 FPS | 520 FPS |
| medium | 495 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 480 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 423 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 176 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 883 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 813 FPS |
| high | 481 FPS | 768 FPS |
| ultra | 412 FPS | 677 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 756 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 692 FPS |
| high | 412 FPS | 650 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 581 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 510 FPS |
| medium | 323 FPS | 429 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 318 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 909 FPS | 984 FPS |
| medium | 818 FPS | 886 FPS |
| high | 695 FPS | 766 FPS |
| ultra | 604 FPS | 665 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 739 FPS | 805 FPS |
| medium | 643 FPS | 701 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 604 FPS |
| ultra | 463 FPS | 519 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 514 FPS | 581 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 462 FPS |
| ultra | 346 FPS | 397 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and Xeon 6737P


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,235 points. Launch price was $5,500.

Xeon 6737P
Xeon 6737P
The Xeon 6737P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 79,634 points. Launch price was $4,995.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon 6737P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon 6737P — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6737P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX scores 83,235 against the Xeon 6737P's 79,634 — a 4.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,266 vs 2,000, a 44.9% lead for the Xeon 6737P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 20,256 vs 45,000 (75.8% advantage for the Xeon 6737P). L3 cache: 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6737P.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+100% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+5% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 2.9 GHz+7% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB+78% | 144 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 83,235+5% | 79,634 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 64,355 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,266 | 2,000+58% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,256 | 45,000+122% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6737P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6737P — the Xeon 6737P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6737P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) vs 88 (Xeon 6737P) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) and C741 (Xeon 6737P).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 4096 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6737P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6737P). Primary use case: Xeon 6737P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Xeon 6737P rivals EPYC 9005.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | High Performance Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX launched at $5489 MSRP, while the Xeon 6737P debuted at $4995. On MSRP ($5489 vs $4995), the Xeon 6737P is $494 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX delivers 15.2 pts/$ vs 15.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6737P — making the Xeon 6737P the 5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5489 | $4995-9% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.2 | 15.9+5% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












