
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Xeon Platinum 8592+
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Xeon Platinum 8592+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Xeon Platinum 8592+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Xeon Platinum 8592+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $6,111 less on MSRP ($5,489 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
- β Delivers 109.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.2 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($5,489 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
- β Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.
- β 60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (83,235 vs 84,013).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 320 MB).
- βOlder platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8592+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Platinum 8592+
2023Why buy it
- β +0.9% higher PassMark.
- β +25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).
- β Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($11,600 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
- β25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX better than Xeon Platinum 8592+?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Xeon Platinum 8592+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019β2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,235 points. Launch price was $5,500.

Xeon Platinum 8592+
The Xeon Platinum 8592+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 320 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,013 points. Launch price was $11,600.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and Xeon Platinum 8592+ share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ β a 7.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses the Matisse (2019β2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX scores 83,235 against the Xeon Platinum 8592+'s 84,013 β a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8592+. L3 cache: 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs 320 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8592+.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 64 / 128 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+8% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+42% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB | 320 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019β2020) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 83,235 | 84,013 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 64,355 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,266 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,256 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX versus 5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ β the Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8592+) β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8592+).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 5600+75% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 4096 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8592+). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Xeon Platinum 8592+ rivals EPYC 9554.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX was priced at $5489, while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ came in at $11600. On launch pricing ($5489 vs $11600), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX was $6111 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX delivers 15.2 pts/$ vs 7.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8592+ β making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX the 70.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5489-53% | $11600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.2+111% | 7.2 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














