Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Xeon Max 9480

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Xeon Max 9480 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

64 / 128

83,235

+0.4%

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen 9 9955HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Xeon Max 9480

56 / 112

82,913

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Xeon Max 9480 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Xeon Max 9480: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+127.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 113 MB).
✅Costs $7,491 less on MSRP ($5,489 MSRP vs $12,980 MSRP).
✅Delivers 137.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.2 vs 6.4 PassMark/$ ($5,489 MSRP vs $12,980 MSRP).
✅Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (20,256 vs 55,000).
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon Max 9480 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Max 9480

2023

Why buy it

✅+171.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (113 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($12,980 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
❌25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX better than Xeon Max 9480?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is ahead with a 7.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Max 9480 pulls ahead with 171.5% better Geekbench multi-core. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX also has the bigger cache pool with 127.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 113 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Max 9480 is the stronger fit. You are getting 171.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 56 cores and 112 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX comes in $7,491 cheaper on MSRP at $5,489 MSRP versus $12,980 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Max 9480 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 171.5% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 137.4% better value on MSRP (15.2 vs 6.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Max 9480 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8, more multi-core headroom with 56 cores / 112 threads instead of 64/128, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Xeon Max 9480 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,235 points. Launch price was $5,500.

Xeon Max 9480

The Xeon Max 9480 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,913 points. Launch price was $12,980.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon Max 9480 offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Max 9480 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Max 9480 uses Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX scores 83,235 against the Xeon Max 9480's 82,913 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,266 vs 1,900, a 40.1% lead for the Xeon Max 9480 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 20,256 vs 55,000 (92.3% advantage for the Xeon Max 9480). L3 cache: 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon Max 9480.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX	Xeon Max 9480
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+14%	56 / 112
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+20%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+42%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB+128%	112.5 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Matisse (2019−2020)	Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023)
PassMark	83,235	82,913
Cinebench R23 Multi	64,355	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,266	1,900+50%
Geekbench 6 Multi	20,256	55,000+172%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Max 9480 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Max 9480 — the Xeon Max 9480 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Max 9480 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) vs 80 (Xeon Max 9480) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) and C741 (Xeon Max 9480).

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX	Xeon Max 9480
Socket	sWRX8	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	2048 GB	4096 GB+100%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Max 9480 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Max 9480). Primary use case: Xeon Max 9480 targets HPC Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Xeon Max 9480 rivals EPYC 9684X.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX	Xeon Max 9480
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	HPC Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX was priced at $5489, while the Xeon Max 9480 came in at $12980. On launch pricing ($5489 vs $12980), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX was $7491 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX delivers 15.2 pts/$ vs 6.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Max 9480 — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX the 81.4% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX	Xeon Max 9480
MSRP	$5489-58%	$12980
Performance per Dollar	15.2+137%	6.4
Release Date	2020	2023

Search Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX on Amazon

Search Xeon Max 9480 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.