Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Xeon w9-3495X
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Xeon w9-3495X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Xeon w9-3495X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Xeon w9-3495X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅+143.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 105 MB).
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($5,489 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3495X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (64,355 vs 72,560).
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon w9-3495X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w9-3495X
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (105 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌7.3% HIGHER MSRP$5,889 MSRPvs$5,489 MSRP
- ❌25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w9-3495X better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Xeon w9-3495X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,235 points. Launch price was $5,500.
Xeon w9-3495X
The Xeon w9-3495X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 105 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 90,441 points. Launch price was $5,889.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon w9-3495X offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3495X — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3495X (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon w9-3495X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX scores 83,235 against the Xeon w9-3495X's 90,441 — a 8.3% lead for the Xeon w9-3495X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 64,355 vs 72,560 (12% advantage for the Xeon w9-3495X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,266 vs 2,136, a 51.1% lead for the Xeon w9-3495X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 20,256 vs 18,600 (8.5% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX). L3 cache: 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs 105 MB on the Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+14% | 56 / 112 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.8 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+42% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB+144% | 105 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 83,235 | 90,441+9% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 64,355 | 72,560+13% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,266 | 2,136+69% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,256+9% | 18,600 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3495X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3495X — the Xeon w9-3495X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w9-3495X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3495X) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) and W790 (Xeon w9-3495X).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 4096 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+14% | 112 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w9-3495X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support true virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon w9-3495X targets Ultimate Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Xeon w9-3495X rivals Threadripper PRO 7995WX.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | true |
| Target Use | — | Ultimate Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX was priced at $5489, while the Xeon w9-3495X came in at $5889. On launch pricing ($5489 vs $5889), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX was $400 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX delivers 15.2 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3495X — making the Xeon w9-3495X the 1.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5489-7% | $5889 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.2 | 15.4+1% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and Xeon w9-3495X
