PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 6737P vs Xeon w9-3575X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 6737P vs Xeon w9-3575X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 6737P

2025

Why buy it

✅+132.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+47.7% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 98 MB).
✅Draws 270W instead of 340W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3575X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 21.8 PassMark/$ ($4,995 MSRP vs $3,789 MSRP).

Xeon w9-3575X

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,206 less on MSRP ($3,789 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
✅Delivers 36.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($3,789 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
✅27.3% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (19,320 vs 45,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (98 MB vs 144 MB).
❌25.9% higher power demand at 340W vs 270W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6737P better than Xeon w9-3575X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon w9-3575X is ahead with a 18.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6737P pulls ahead with 132.9% better Geekbench multi-core. Xeon 6737P also has the bigger cache pool with 47.7% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 98 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6737P is the stronger fit. You are getting 132.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 47.7% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 98 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6737P is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon w9-3575X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon 6737P comes in 31.8% more expensive on MSRP at $4,995 MSRP versus $3,789 MSRP, and it still gives you 132.9% better Geekbench multi-core. The compromise is that Xeon w9-3575X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 18.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon w9-3575X is also 36.6% better value on MSRP (21.8 vs 15.9 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6737P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024), 47.7% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 98 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 44/88. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Xeon 6737P vs Xeon w9-3575X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6737P

The Xeon 6737P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 79,634 points. Launch price was $4,995.

Xeon w9-3575X

The Xeon w9-3575X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 44 cores and 88 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 97.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 340 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,507 points. Launch price was $3,789.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6737P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon w9-3575X offers 44 cores / 88 threads — the Xeon w9-3575X has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon 6737P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3575X — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3575X (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon 6737P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon w9-3575X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6737P scores 79,634 against the Xeon w9-3575X's 82,507 — a 3.5% lead for the Xeon w9-3575X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,000 vs 2,300, a 14% lead for the Xeon w9-3575X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 45,000 vs 19,320 (79.9% advantage for the Xeon 6737P). L3 cache: 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6737P vs 97.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3575X.

Feature	Xeon 6737P	Xeon w9-3575X
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	44 / 88+38%
Boost Clock	4 GHz	4.8 GHz+20%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+32%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	144 MB (total)+48%	97.5 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 3 nm-57%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	79,634	82,507+4%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	60,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,000	2,300+15%
Geekbench 6 Multi	45,000+133%	19,320

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6737P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3575X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6737P versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3575X — the Xeon 6737P supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6737P) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3575X) — the Xeon w9-3575X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon 6737P) and W790 (Xeon w9-3575X).

Feature	Xeon 6737P	Xeon w9-3575X
Socket	LGA4710	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400+33%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	88	112+27%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w9-3575X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6737P) vs true (Xeon w9-3575X). Primary use case: Xeon 6737P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6737P rivals EPYC 9005; Xeon w9-3575X rivals Ryzen Threadripper 7970X.

Feature	Xeon 6737P	Xeon w9-3575X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true
Target Use	High Performance Server	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon 6737P was priced at $4995, while the Xeon w9-3575X came in at $3789. On launch pricing ($4995 vs $3789), Xeon w9-3575X was $1206 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6737P delivers 15.9 pts/$ vs 21.8 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3575X — making the Xeon w9-3575X the 30.9% better value option.

Feature	Xeon 6737P	Xeon w9-3575X
MSRP	$4995	$3789-24%
Performance per Dollar	15.9	21.8+37%
Release Date	2025	2024

Search Xeon 6737P on Amazon

Search Xeon w9-3575X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.