Xeon 6737P vs EPYC 9354P
Xeon 6737P
EPYC 9354P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6737P
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9354P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon 6737P | EPYC 9354P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,995) | ✅ More affordable ($2,205) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon 6737P | EPYC 9354P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+113%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,995) | ✅ More affordable ($2,205) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6737P and EPYC 9354P
Xeon 6737P
The Xeon 6737P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 79,634 points. Launch price was $4,995.
EPYC 9354P
The EPYC 9354P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 74,808 points. Launch price was $2,730.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon 6737P and EPYC 9354P share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon 6737P versus 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9354P — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Xeon 6737P (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.25 GHz). The Xeon 6737P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the EPYC 9354P uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6737P scores 79,634 against the EPYC 9354P's 74,808 — a 6.2% lead for the Xeon 6737P. L3 cache: 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6737P vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9354P.
| Feature | Xeon 6737P | EPYC 9354P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+5% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.25 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 144 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+78% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-40% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 79,634+6% | 74,808 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 45,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6737P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9354P uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6737P versus 4800 on the EPYC 9354P — the EPYC 9354P supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9354P supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon 6737P) vs 12 (EPYC 9354P). PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6737P) vs 128 (EPYC 9354P) — the EPYC 9354P offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon 6737P) and SP5 (EPYC 9354P).
| Feature | Xeon 6737P | EPYC 9354P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | 4800+95900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+69904967% | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 88 | 128+45% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6737P) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9354P). Primary use case: Xeon 6737P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6737P rivals EPYC 9005; EPYC 9354P rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | Xeon 6737P | EPYC 9354P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | High Performance Server | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon 6737P launched at $4995 MSRP, while the EPYC 9354P debuted at $2730. At current prices ($4995 vs $2205), the EPYC 9354P is $2790 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6737P delivers 15.9 pts/$ vs 33.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9354P — making the EPYC 9354P the 72.1% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6737P | EPYC 9354P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4995 | $2730-45% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4995 | $2205-56% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.9 | 33.9+113% |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon 6737P and EPYC 9354P
