
Xeon 6780E vs Core i5-10400F

Xeon 6780E

Core i5-10400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6780E
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon 6780E | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($8,513) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Sierra Forest (2024) / Intel 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon 6780E | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1154%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($8,513) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6780E and Core i5-10400F

Xeon 6780E
The Xeon 6780E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 144 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 108 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 86,734 points. Launch price was $11,350.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6780E packs 144 cores / 144 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon 6780E has 138 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon 6780E versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 35.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon 6780E uses the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6780E scores 86,734 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 147.8% lead for the Xeon 6780E. L3 cache: 108 MB (total) on the Xeon 6780E vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Xeon 6780E | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 144 / 144+2300% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.3 GHz+43% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.9 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 108 MB (total)+800% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (per module)+1500% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-79% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Sierra Forest (2024) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 86,734+566% | 13,029 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,454 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6780E uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6780E versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Xeon 6780E supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon 6780E) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6780E) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Xeon 6780E offers 72 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Xeon 6780E | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+25% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 TB+3100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 88+450% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6780E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: Xeon 6780E targets Cloud Native Compute, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Xeon 6780E rivals EPYC 9754; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Xeon 6780E | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Cloud Native Compute | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Xeon 6780E launched at $11350 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. At current prices ($8513 vs $102), the Core i5-10400F is $8411 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6780E delivers 10.2 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 170.5% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6780E | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $11350 | $160-99% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $8513 | $102-99% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.2 | 127.7+1152% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















