PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 6780E vs Xeon Platinum 8368 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 6780E vs Xeon Platinum 8368: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 6780E

2024

Why buy it

✅+89.5% larger total L3 cache (108 MB vs 57 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅37.5% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8368 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (86,734 vs 92,054).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($11,350 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
❌22.2% higher power demand at 330W vs 270W.

Xeon Platinum 8368

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,136 less on MSRP ($7,214 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
✅Delivers 67.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.8 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($7,214 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
✅Draws 270W instead of 330W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (57 MB vs 108 MB).
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon 6780E moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8368 better than Xeon 6780E?

Yes. Xeon Platinum 8368 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 6.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8368 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8368 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.1% better PassMark, backed by 38 cores and 76 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8368 is the better buy right now. Xeon Platinum 8368 comes in $4,136 cheaper on MSRP at $7,214 MSRP versus $11,350 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 67.0% better value on MSRP (12.8 vs 7.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6780E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and 89.5% larger total L3 cache (108 MB vs 57 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon 6780E vs Xeon Platinum 8368 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6780E

The Xeon 6780E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 144 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 108 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 86,734 points. Launch price was $11,350.

Xeon Platinum 8368

The Xeon Platinum 8368 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 92,054 points. Launch price was $7,214.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6780E packs 144 cores / 144 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8368 offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon 6780E has 106 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon 6780E versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368 — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8368 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon 6780E uses the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8368 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6780E scores 86,734 against the Xeon Platinum 8368's 92,054 — a 6% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8368. L3 cache: 108 MB (total) on the Xeon 6780E vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368.

Feature	Xeon 6780E	Xeon Platinum 8368
Cores / Threads	144 / 144+279%	38 / 76
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.4 GHz+13%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.4 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	108 MB (total)+89%	57 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (per module)+300%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 3 nm-70%	10 nm
Architecture	Sierra Forest (2024)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	86,734	92,054+6%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	20,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	25,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6780E uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8368 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6780E versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368 — the Xeon 6780E supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8368 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6780E) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8368) — the Xeon 6780E offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Xeon 6780E	Xeon Platinum 8368
Socket	LGA4710	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400+100%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4 TB	6 TB+50%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	88+38%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6780E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8368). Primary use case: Xeon 6780E targets Cloud Native Compute, Xeon Platinum 8368 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6780E rivals EPYC 9754; Xeon Platinum 8368 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	Xeon 6780E	Xeon Platinum 8368
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Cloud Native Compute	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon 6780E was priced at $11350, while the Xeon Platinum 8368 came in at $7214. On launch pricing ($11350 vs $7214), Xeon Platinum 8368 was $4136 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6780E delivers 7.6 pts/$ vs 12.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8368 — making the Xeon Platinum 8368 the 50.2% better value option.

Feature	Xeon 6780E	Xeon Platinum 8368
MSRP	$11350	$7214-36%
Performance per Dollar	7.6	12.8+68%
Release Date	2024	2021

Search Xeon 6780E on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8368 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.