
Xeon 6780E

Xeon w9-3495X
Xeon 6780E vs Xeon w9-3495X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon 6780E vs Xeon w9-3495X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon 6780E vs Xeon w9-3495X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon 6780E
2024Why buy it
- β Draws 330W instead of 350W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3495X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (86,734 vs 90,441).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($11,350 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
Xeon w9-3495X
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +23.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $5,461 less on MSRP ($5,889 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
- β Delivers 101.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.4 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
- β 27.3% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βFewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w9-3495X better than Xeon 6780E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon 6780E vs Xeon w9-3495X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6780E
The Xeon 6780E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 144 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 108 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 86,734 points. Launch price was $11,350.

Xeon w9-3495X
The Xeon w9-3495X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023β2024) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 105 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 90,441 points. Launch price was $5,889.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6780E packs 144 cores / 144 threads, while the Xeon w9-3495X offers 56 cores / 112 threads β the Xeon 6780E has 88 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon 6780E versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3495X β a 46.2% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3495X (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Xeon 6780E uses the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon w9-3495X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023β2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6780E scores 86,734 against the Xeon w9-3495X's 90,441 β a 4.2% lead for the Xeon w9-3495X. L3 cache: 108 MB (total) on the Xeon 6780E vs 105 MB on the Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | Xeon 6780E | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 144 / 144+157% | 56 / 112 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.8 GHz+60% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+16% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 108 MB (total)+3% | 105 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (per module)+100% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-57% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Sierra Forest (2024) | Sapphire Rapids (2023β2024) |
| PassMark | 86,734 | 90,441+4% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 72,560 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 2,136 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 18,600 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6780E uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3495X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6780E versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3495X β the Xeon 6780E supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 TB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6780E) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3495X) β the Xeon w9-3495X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Xeon 6780E | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+33% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 TB | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 88 | 112+27% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6780E) vs true (Xeon w9-3495X). Primary use case: Xeon 6780E targets Cloud Native Compute, Xeon w9-3495X targets Ultimate Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon 6780E rivals EPYC 9754; Xeon w9-3495X rivals Threadripper PRO 7995WX.
| Feature | Xeon 6780E | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | β | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT | true |
| Target Use | Cloud Native Compute | Ultimate Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon 6780E was priced at $11350, while the Xeon w9-3495X came in at $5889. On launch pricing ($11350 vs $5889), Xeon w9-3495X was $5461 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6780E delivers 7.6 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3495X β making the Xeon w9-3495X the 67.1% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6780E | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $11350 | $5889-48% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.6 | 15.4+103% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















