Xeon 6780E vs EPYC 9534
Xeon 6780E
EPYC 9534
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6780E
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9534
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon 6780E | EPYC 9534 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($8,513) | ✅ More affordable ($2,999) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Sierra Forest (2024) / Intel 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon 6780E | EPYC 9534 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+192%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($8,513) | ✅ More affordable ($2,999) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6780E and EPYC 9534
Xeon 6780E
The Xeon 6780E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 144 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 108 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 86,734 points. Launch price was $11,350.
EPYC 9534
The EPYC 9534 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 89,077 points. Launch price was $8,803.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6780E packs 144 cores / 144 threads, while the EPYC 9534 offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the Xeon 6780E has 80 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon 6780E versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9534 — a 20.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 9534 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.45 GHz). The Xeon 6780E uses the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the EPYC 9534 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6780E scores 86,734 against the EPYC 9534's 89,077 — a 2.7% lead for the EPYC 9534. L3 cache: 108 MB (total) on the Xeon 6780E vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9534.
| Feature | Xeon 6780E | EPYC 9534 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 144 / 144+125% | 64 / 128 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.7 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.45 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | 108 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+137% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (per module)+300% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-40% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Sierra Forest (2024) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 86,734 | 89,077+3% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,650 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6780E uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9534 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The EPYC 9534 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 199.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon 6780E) vs 12 (EPYC 9534). PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6780E) vs 128 (EPYC 9534) — the EPYC 9534 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Xeon 6780E | EPYC 9534 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 TB | 6144 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 88 | 128+45% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6780E) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9534). Primary use case: Xeon 6780E targets Cloud Native Compute, EPYC 9534 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6780E rivals EPYC 9754; EPYC 9534 rivals Xeon Platinum 8470.
| Feature | Xeon 6780E | EPYC 9534 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Cloud Native Compute | Server |
Value Analysis
The Xeon 6780E launched at $11350 MSRP, while the EPYC 9534 debuted at $8803. At current prices ($8513 vs $2999), the EPYC 9534 is $5514 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6780E delivers 10.2 pts/$ vs 29.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 9534 — making the EPYC 9534 the 97.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6780E | EPYC 9534 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $11350 | $8803-22% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $8513 | $2999-65% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.2 | 29.7+191% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon 6780E and EPYC 9534
