
Xeon E-2104G

Xeon E5-1620
Xeon E-2104G vs Xeon E5-1620 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon E-2104G vs Xeon E5-1620 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon E-2104G vs Xeon E5-1620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon E-2104G
2018Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $692 less on MSRP ($193 MSRP vs $885 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 359.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.4 vs 6.6 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $885 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1620 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).
Xeon E5-1620
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,848 vs 5,858).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.6 vs 30.4 PassMark/$ ($885 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2104G better than Xeon E5-1620?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E-2104G vs Xeon E5-1620 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E-2104G
The Xeon E-2104G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 July 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 5,858 points. Launch price was $193.

Xeon E5-1620
The Xeon E5-1620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,848 points. Launch price was $313.
Processing Power
The Xeon E-2104G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E5-1620's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E-2104G versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1620 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon E-2104G uses the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-1620 uses Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2104G scores 5,858 against the Xeon E5-1620's 5,848 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E-2104G. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2104G vs 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620.
| Feature | Xeon E-2104G | Xeon E5-1620 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 10240 kB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) | Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 5,858 | 5,848 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 3,469 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 612 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,250 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E-2104G uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1620 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E-2104G | Xeon E5-1620 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 375 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E-2104G) / true (Xeon E5-1620).
| Feature | Xeon E-2104G | Xeon E5-1620 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon E-2104G was priced at $193, while the Xeon E5-1620 came in at $885. On launch pricing ($193 vs $885), Xeon E-2104G was $692 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E-2104G delivers 30.4 pts/$ vs 6.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1620 — making the Xeon E-2104G the 128.5% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E-2104G | Xeon E5-1620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $193-78% | $885 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.4+361% | 6.6 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















