
Xeon E3-1225 v3

Xeon E5-2430L
Xeon E3-1225 v3 vs Xeon E5-2430L Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon E3-1225 v3 vs Xeon E5-2430L FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon E3-1225 v3 vs Xeon E5-2430L: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon E3-1225 v3
2013Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $327 less on MSRP ($224 MSRP vs $551 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 147.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.8 vs 9.6 PassMark/$ ($224 MSRP vs $551 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics P4600, while Xeon E5-2430L needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2430L across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
- ❌40% higher power demand at 84W vs 60W.
Xeon E5-2430L
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 84W, a 24W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,300 vs 5,324).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 23.8 PassMark/$ ($551 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E3-1225 v3 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E3-1225 v3 better than Xeon E5-2430L?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E3-1225 v3 vs Xeon E5-2430L Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E3-1225 v3
The Xeon E3-1225 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,324 points. Launch price was $384.

Xeon E5-2430L
The Xeon E5-2430L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,300 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon E3-1225 v3 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2430L offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2430L has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E3-1225 v3 versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2430L — a 36.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1225 v3 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon E3-1225 v3 uses the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2430L uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1225 v3 scores 5,324 against the Xeon E5-2430L's 5,300 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E3-1225 v3. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1225 v3 vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2430L.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1225 v3 | Xeon E5-2430L |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+44% | 2.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+60% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB (total) | 15360 kB (total)+88% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell-WS (2013−2014) | Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) |
| PassMark | 5,324 | 5,300 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 2,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,108 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,324 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E3-1225 v3 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2430L uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1225 v3 | Xeon E5-2430L |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA1356 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E3-1225 v3) / not specified (Xeon E5-2430L). The Xeon E3-1225 v3 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics P4600), while the Xeon E5-2430L requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1225 v3 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon E3-1225 v3 rivals Core i5-4570.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1225 v3 | Xeon E5-2430L |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics P4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon E3-1225 v3 was priced at $224, while the Xeon E5-2430L came in at $551. On launch pricing ($224 vs $551), Xeon E3-1225 v3 was $327 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1225 v3 delivers 23.8 pts/$ vs 9.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2430L — making the Xeon E3-1225 v3 the 84.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1225 v3 | Xeon E5-2430L |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $224-59% | $551 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.8+148% | 9.6 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














