Xeon E5-1620 v3
VS
Xeon X5680

Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Xeon X5680

Intel

Xeon E5-1620 v3

4 Cores8 Thrd140 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Xeon X5680

6 Cores12 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-1620 v3 is positioned at rank 577 and the Xeon X5680 is on rank 704, so the Xeon E5-1620 v3 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1620 v3

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
8780%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1658%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1473%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1138%
#348
Xeon Gold 6426Y
MSRP: $2145|Avg: N/A
99%
#349
EPYC 4565P
MSRP: $2730|Avg: $1980
99%
#351
Xeon W-2295
MSRP: $1333|Avg: $1400
98%
#352
Xeon 6741P
MSRP: $4421|Avg: $3780
96%
#353
EPYC 7452
MSRP: $2025|Avg: $2025
95%
#354
EPYC 7502P
MSRP: $2300|Avg: $1299
94%
#577
Xeon E5-1620 v3
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
100%
#583
Xeon E3-1245 v2
MSRP: $273|Avg: $204
98%
#590
Xeon W-2125
MSRP: $444|Avg: $42
95%
#592
EPYC 7261
MSRP: $501|Avg: $8
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5680

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
13530%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
98%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2555%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2270%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1753%
#411
Xeon w9-3495X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6333
100%
#412
Xeon Gold 5320T
MSRP: $1977|Avg: $1379
100%
#413
EPYC 7643
MSRP: $4995|Avg: $2750
99%
#414
Xeon Gold 6330N
MSRP: $2389|Avg: $1798
99%
#415
EPYC 7473X
MSRP: $3900|Avg: $200
99%
#416
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $3486
99%
#417
EPYC 9474F
MSRP: $6780|Avg: $3723
98%
#418
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
MSRP: $11699|Avg: $11699
98%
#704
Xeon X5680
MSRP: $450|Avg: $13
100%
#707
Pentium 1403 v2
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#716
Xeon E5-4655 v3
MSRP: $623|Avg: $150
98%
#717
Xeon E3-1220 v6
MSRP: $372|Avg: $80
98%
#718
Xeon E5-2623 v3
MSRP: $444|Avg: $50
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Analysis: Based on specifications, the Xeon E5-1620 v3 shows stronger theoretical performance metrics.
InsightXeon E5-1620 v3Xeon X5680
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($189)
More affordable ($13)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Xeon X5680 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $13 (vs $189), it costs 93% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 1344% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Xeon E5-1620 v3.
InsightXeon E5-1620 v3Xeon X5680
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1344%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($189)
More affordable ($13)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-1620 v3 and Xeon X5680

Intel

Xeon E5-1620 v3

The Xeon E5-1620 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 6,959 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon X5680

The Xeon X5680 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,910 points. Launch price was $172.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-1620 v3 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon X5680 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon X5680 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 v3 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon X5680 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Xeon E5-1620 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon X5680 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1620 v3 scores 6,959 against the Xeon X5680's 6,910 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-1620 v3. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5680.

FeatureXeon E5-1620 v3Xeon X5680
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+5%
3.33 GHz
L3 Cache
10 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+20%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark
6,959
6,910
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-1620 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5680 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Xeon E5-1620 v3 versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5680 — the Xeon E5-1620 v3 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-1620 v3) vs 3 (Xeon X5680). Chipset compatibility: Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-1620 v3) and Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5680).

FeatureXeon E5-1620 v3Xeon X5680
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133+33%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
768 GB
RAM Channels
4+33%
3
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon E5-1620 v3 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-1620 v3) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5680). Primary use case: Xeon E5-1620 v3 targets Server, Xeon X5680 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5680 rivals Core i7-980X.

FeatureXeon E5-1620 v3Xeon X5680
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Server
Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5-1620 v3 launched at $294 MSRP, while the Xeon X5680 debuted at $450. At current prices ($189 vs $13), the Xeon X5680 is $176 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-1620 v3 delivers 36.8 pts/$ vs 531.5 pts/$ for the Xeon X5680 — making the Xeon X5680 the 174.1% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5-1620 v3Xeon X5680
MSRP
$294-35%
$450
Avg Price (30d)
$189
$13-93%
Performance per Dollar
36.8
531.5+1344%
Release Date
2014
2010