Xeon E5-2407 v2 vs Xeon L5609

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2407 v2 vs Xeon L5609 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2407 v2 vs Xeon L5609: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2407 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,272 vs 3,298).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 14.4 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 80W vs 40W.

Xeon L5609

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅+20% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 10 MB).
✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 10.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($229 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Draws 40W instead of 80W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2407 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon L5609 better than Xeon E5-2407 v2?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2407 v2 is ahead with a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon L5609 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Xeon L5609 also has the bigger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 10 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon L5609 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 10 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon L5609 is the better buy right now. Xeon L5609 comes in $21 cheaper on MSRP at $229 MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2407 v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 10.0% better value on MSRP (14.4 vs 13.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2407 v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2407 v2 vs Xeon L5609 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2407 v2

The Xeon E5-2407 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,272 points. Launch price was $476.

Xeon L5609

The Xeon L5609 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,298 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2407 v2 and Xeon L5609 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2407 v2 versus 1.86 GHz on the Xeon L5609 — a 25.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2407 v2 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The Xeon E5-2407 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon L5609 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2407 v2 scores 3,272 against the Xeon L5609's 3,298 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon L5609. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2407 v2 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon L5609.

Feature	Xeon E5-2407 v2	Xeon L5609
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+29%	1.86 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+29%	1.86 GHz
L3 Cache	10 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+20%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	3,272	3,298

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2407 v2 uses the LGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon L5609 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-2407 v2	Xeon L5609
Socket	LGA1356	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-2407 v2 was priced at $250, while the Xeon L5609 came in at $229. On launch pricing ($250 vs $229), Xeon L5609 was $21 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2407 v2 delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 14.4 pts/$ for the Xeon L5609 — making the Xeon L5609 the 9.6% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-2407 v2	Xeon L5609
MSRP	$250	$229-8%
Performance per Dollar	13.1	14.4+10%
Release Date	2013	2010

Search Xeon E5-2407 v2 on Amazon

Search Xeon L5609 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.