Xeon E5-2407 v2 vs Xeon W3570

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2407 v2 vs Xeon W3570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2407 v2 vs Xeon W3570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2407 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Costs $749 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 300.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 3.3 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Draws 80W instead of 130W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W3570 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon W3570

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,267 vs 3,272).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
❌62.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2407 v2 better than Xeon W3570?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W3570 is ahead with a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2407 v2 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2407 v2 also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2407 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2407 v2 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2407 v2 comes in $749 cheaper on MSRP at $250 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon W3570 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 300.2% better value on MSRP (13.1 vs 3.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2407 v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009), 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2407 v2 vs Xeon W3570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2407 v2

The Xeon E5-2407 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,272 points. Launch price was $476.

Xeon W3570

The Xeon W3570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,267 points. Launch price was $480.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2407 v2 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon W3570's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2407 v2 versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W3570 — a 36.2% clock advantage for the Xeon W3570 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-2407 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon W3570 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2407 v2 scores 3,272 against the Xeon W3570's 3,267 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2407 v2. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2407 v2 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3570.

Feature	Xeon E5-2407 v2	Xeon W3570
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	3.46 GHz+44%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.2 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	10 MB (total)+25%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)	Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark	3,272	3,267

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2407 v2 uses the LGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3570 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-2407 v2	Xeon W3570
Socket	LGA1356	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-2407 v2 was priced at $250, while the Xeon W3570 came in at $999. On launch pricing ($250 vs $999), Xeon E5-2407 v2 was $749 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2407 v2 delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 3.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W3570 — making the Xeon E5-2407 v2 the 120% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-2407 v2	Xeon W3570
MSRP	$250-75%	$999
Performance per Dollar	13.1+297%	3.3
Release Date	2013	2009

Search Xeon E5-2407 v2 on Amazon

Search Xeon W3570 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.