Xeon E5-2618L v4 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U
Xeon E5-2618L v4
Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5-2618L v4 is positioned at rank #429 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2618L v4
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2618L v4 | Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($33) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Barcelo-R (2023) / 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2618L v4 | Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($33) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U
Xeon E5-2618L v4
The Xeon E5-2618L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 12,429 points. Launch price was $779.
Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U
The Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-R (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 12,477 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2618L v4 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2618L v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2618L v4 versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U — a 64.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U. The Xeon E5-2618L v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U uses Barcelo-R (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2618L v4 scores 12,429 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U's 12,477 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U. L3 cache: 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2618L v4 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2618L v4 | Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+150% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz+95% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB+213% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB+400% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Barcelo-R (2023) |
| PassMark | 12,429 | 12,477 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U
