Xeon E5-2618L v4 vs Core i7-9700E
Xeon E5-2618L v4
Core i7-9700E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5-2618L v4 is positioned at rank #429 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2618L v4
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-9700E
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2618L v4 | Core i7-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($33) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2618L v4 | Core i7-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+439%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($33) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Core i7-9700E
Xeon E5-2618L v4
The Xeon E5-2618L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 12,429 points. Launch price was $779.
Core i7-9700E
The Core i7-9700E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 12,575 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2618L v4 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i7-9700E offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2618L v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2618L v4 versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i7-9700E — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700E. The Xeon E5-2618L v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-9700E uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2618L v4 scores 12,429 against the Core i7-9700E's 12,575 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-9700E. L3 cache: 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2618L v4 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700E.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2618L v4 | Core i7-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+25% | 8 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz+100% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB+108% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB+900% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 12,429 | 12,575+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 6,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,172 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 6,802 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2618L v4) / Yes (Core i7-9700E). The Core i7-9700E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2618L v4 | Core i7-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 630 |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-2618L v4 launched at $779 MSRP, while the Core i7-9700E debuted at $259. At current prices ($33 vs $180), the Xeon E5-2618L v4 is $147 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2618L v4 delivers 376.6 pts/$ vs 69.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-9700E — making the Xeon E5-2618L v4 the 137.4% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2618L v4 | Core i7-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $779 | $259-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $33-82% | $180 |
| Performance per Dollar | 376.6+439% | 69.9 |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Core i7-9700E
