Xeon E5-2650
VS
Core i3-9320

Xeon E5-2650 vs Core i3-9320

Intel

Xeon E5-2650

8 Cores16 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i3-9320

4 Cores4 Thrd62 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5-2650 is positioned at rank #406 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2650

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5655%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1068%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
949%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
733%
#274
EPYC 7313
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
98%
#275
Xeon w5-2455X
MSRP: $1039|Avg: $1049
97%
#276
Xeon w3-2425
MSRP: $529|Avg: $529
97%
#278
Xeon Gold 5416S
MSRP: $1445|Avg: N/A
95%
#406
Xeon E5-2650
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#416
Xeon E3-1276 v3
MSRP: $213|Avg: $244
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-9320

#189
Ryzen 7 4700GE
MSRP: $299|Avg: $200
107%
#190
Core i5-10400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $100
106%
#191
Core i5-10600KF
MSRP: $250|Avg: $145
106%
#192
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
MSRP: $99|Avg: $70
106%
#193
Core i9-12900F
MSRP: $494|Avg: $370
105%
#194
Core i5-12400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $195
105%
#195
Ryzen 5 7400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
104%
#196
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $589
104%
#197
Ryzen 5 5600X3D
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
104%
#198
Core i3-9350KF
MSRP: $173|Avg: $80
103%
#199
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
MSRP: $220|Avg: $220
103%
#200
Core i3-9300
MSRP: $143|Avg: $75
103%
#201
Ryzen 7 3800XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $249
102%
#202
Core i5-11400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $140
101%
#203
Core i3-10305
MSRP: $149|Avg: $100
100%
#204
Core i3-9320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $80
100%
#205
Core i3-10105
MSRP: $122|Avg: $90
100%
#206
Core i3-13100E
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#207
Core i9-13900F
MSRP: $524|Avg: $536
99%
#208
Processor 300
MSRP: $82|Avg: $80
99%
#209
Ryzen 5 2600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $145
99%
#210
Ryzen 5 2400GE
MSRP: $169|Avg: $80
98%
#211
Core i9-14900KS
MSRP: $749|Avg: $670
98%
#212
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $384
97%
#213
Core i3-8100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $59
97%
#214
Core i7-13700E
MSRP: $390|Avg: $380
97%
#215
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
MSRP: $430|Avg: $270
97%
#216
Core i7-9700
MSRP: $333|Avg: $150
96%
#217
Core i5-13500TE
MSRP: $235|Avg: $250
95%
#218
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
MSRP: $294|Avg: $76
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-9320 (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2650Core i3-9320
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2650 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2650Core i3-9320
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2650 and Core i3-9320

Intel

Xeon E5-2650

The Xeon E5-2650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,349 points. Launch price was $91.

Intel

Core i3-9320

The Core i3-9320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,358 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2650 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i3-9320 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-2650 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650 versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-9320 — a 44.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-9320 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Xeon E5-2650 uses the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-9320 uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2650 scores 7,349 against the Core i3-9320's 7,358 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-9320. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9320.

FeatureXeon E5-2650Core i3-9320
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+100%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
4.4 GHz+57%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.7 GHz+85%
L3 Cache
20480 kB (total)+233%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark
7,349
7,358
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2650 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i3-9320 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2650Core i3-9320
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
384 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2650) / not specified (Core i3-9320). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2650 targets Server.

FeatureXeon E5-2650Core i3-9320
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Server