
Xeon E5-2658 v4

Xeon W-2135
Xeon E5-2658 v4 vs Xeon W-2135 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon E5-2658 v4 vs Xeon W-2135 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon E5-2658 v4 vs Xeon W-2135: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon E5-2658 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+324.2% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 8.3 MB).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 140W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon W-2135
2017Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,396 vs 14,434).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 35 MB).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 140W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2658 v4 better than Xeon W-2135?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E5-2658 v4 vs Xeon W-2135 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2658 v4
The Xeon E5-2658 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 14,434 points. Launch price was $1,832.

Xeon W-2135
The Xeon W-2135 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 14,396 points. Launch price was $835.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2658 v4 packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Xeon W-2135 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2658 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2658 v4 versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-2135 — a 64.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2135. The Xeon E5-2658 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-2135 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2658 v4 scores 14,434 against the Xeon W-2135's 14,396 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2658 v4. L3 cache: 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2658 v4 vs 8.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2135.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2658 v4 | Xeon W-2135 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 28+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 2.3 GHz | 4.5 GHz+96% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 35 MB+324% | 8.25 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 3.5 MB+250% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 14,434 | 14,396 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2658 v4 uses the FCLGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-2135 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2658 v4 | Xeon W-2135 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCLGA2011-3 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













