Ryzen 7 5825C vs Xeon E5-2658 v4

Ryzen 7 5825C vs Xeon E5-2658 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 5825C

8 / 16

14,561

+0.9%

Ryzen Embedded V1756B

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2658 v4

14 / 28

14,434

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 5825C vs Xeon E5-2658 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 5825C vs Xeon E5-2658 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 5825C

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Xeon E5-2658 v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 35 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2658 v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2658 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2658 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+118.8% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5825C across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,434 vs 14,561).
❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 5825C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5825C better than Xeon E5-2658 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2658 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5825C is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 5825C is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5825C is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5825C is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 5825C comes in at an unclear MSRP at $400 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (36.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5825C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 14/28. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 7 5825C vs Xeon E5-2658 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 5825C

The Ryzen 7 5825C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,561 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2658 v4

The Xeon E5-2658 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 14,434 points. Launch price was $1,832.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 5825C packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2658 v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2658 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5825C versus 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2658 v4 — a 64.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5825C. The Ryzen 7 5825C uses the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2658 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5825C scores 14,561 against the Xeon E5-2658 v4's 14,434 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 5825C. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5825C vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2658 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5825C	Xeon E5-2658 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	14 / 28+75%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+96%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	35 MB+119%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+14529%	3.5 MB
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	14,561	14,434
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,551	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,961	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,145	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5825C uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2658 v4 uses FCLGA2011-3 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5825C	Xeon E5-2658 v4
Socket	FP6	FCLGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 7 5825C) / not specified (Xeon E5-2658 v4). The Ryzen 7 5825C includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Xeon E5-2658 v4 requires a dedicated GPU.