Ryzen 7 5825C vs Xeon W-1290TE

CPU

GPU

Ryzen 7 5825C

8 Cores16 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon W-1290TE

10 Cores20 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2020

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 5825C vs Xeon W-1290TE Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 5825C

8 / 16

14,561

+0.4%

Ryzen Embedded V1756B

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon W-1290TE

10 / 20

14,505

0.0%

Core i5-9500T

Core i5-1155G7

Core i7-1250U

Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 5825C vs Xeon W-1290TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 5825C vs Xeon W-1290TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 5825C

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $152 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $552 MSRP).
✅Delivers 38.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.4 vs 26.3 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $552 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1290TE, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 16 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-1290TE

2020

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 16 PCIe lanes vs 8.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5825C across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,478 vs 7,145).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.3 vs 36.4 PassMark/$ ($552 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5825C better than Xeon W-1290TE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-1290TE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5825C is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 5825C is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5825C is the stronger fit. You are getting 188.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5825C is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 5825C comes in $152 cheaper on MSRP at $400 MSRP versus $552 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 38.5% better value on MSRP (36.4 vs 26.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5825C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 7 5825C vs Xeon W-1290TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 5825C

The Ryzen 7 5825C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,561 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon W-1290TE

The Xeon W-1290TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,505 points. Launch price was $552.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 5825C packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-1290TE offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon W-1290TE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5825C versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-1290TE — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5825C uses the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-1290TE uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5825C scores 14,561 against the Xeon W-1290TE's 14,505 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 5825C. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,961 vs 2,507, a 24.4% lead for the Xeon W-1290TE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,145 vs 2,478 (97% advantage for the Ryzen 7 5825C). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5825C vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1290TE.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5825C	Xeon W-1290TE
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz+11%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023)	Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark	14,561	14,505
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,551	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,961	2,507+28%
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,145+188%	2,478

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5825C uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1290TE uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5825C versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-1290TE — the Ryzen 7 5825C supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-1290TE supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Ryzen 7 5825C) vs 16 (Xeon W-1290TE) — the Xeon W-1290TE offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Ryzen 7 5825C) and W480 (Xeon W-1290TE).

Feature	Ryzen 7 5825C	Xeon W-1290TE
Socket	FP6	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+9%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	128 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 7 5825C) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-1290TE). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Vega 8 (Ryzen 7 5825C) and Intel UHD Graphics P630 (Xeon W-1290TE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon W-1290TE targets Workstation.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5825C	Xeon W-1290TE
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon Vega 8	Intel UHD Graphics P630
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	Yes	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 7 5825C was priced at $400, while the Xeon W-1290TE came in at $552. On launch pricing ($400 vs $552), Ryzen 7 5825C was $152 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5825C delivers 36.4 pts/$ vs 26.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1290TE — making the Ryzen 7 5825C the 32.3% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5825C	Xeon W-1290TE
MSRP	$400-28%	$552
Performance per Dollar	36.4+38%	26.3
Release Date	2022	2020

Search Ryzen 7 5825C on Amazon

Search Xeon W-1290TE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.