Ryzen 7 5825C vs Xeon E5-2687W v3

CPU

GPU

Ryzen 7 5825C

8 Cores16 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon E5-2687W v3

10 Cores20 Thrd160 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 5825C vs Xeon E5-2687W v3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 5825C

8 / 16

14,561

+0.2%

Ryzen Embedded V1756B

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2687W v3

10 / 20

14,538

0.0%

Core i7-8569U

Core i5-1155G7

Core i7-1250U

Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 5825C vs Xeon E5-2687W v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 5825C vs Xeon E5-2687W v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 5825C

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,741 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $2,141 MSRP).
✅Delivers 436.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.4 vs 6.8 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $2,141 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 160W, a 145W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Xeon E5-2687W v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2687W v3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2687W v3

2014

Why buy it

✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 8.
✅400% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5825C across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,538 vs 14,561).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 36.4 PassMark/$ ($2,141 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
❌966.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 5825C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5825C better than Xeon E5-2687W v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2687W v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5825C is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 5825C is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5825C is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5825C is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 5825C comes in $1,741 cheaper on MSRP at $400 MSRP versus $2,141 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 436.1% better value on MSRP (36.4 vs 6.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5825C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 7 5825C vs Xeon E5-2687W v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 5825C

The Ryzen 7 5825C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,561 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2687W v3

The Xeon E5-2687W v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 14,538 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 5825C packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2687W v3 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2687W v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5825C versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2687W v3 — a 25% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5825C (base: 2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5825C uses the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2687W v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5825C scores 14,561 against the Xeon E5-2687W v3's 14,538 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 5825C. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5825C vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2687W v3.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5825C	Xeon E5-2687W v3
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+29%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.1 GHz+55%
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	25 MB (total)+56%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	14,561	14,538
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,551	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,961	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,145	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5825C uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2687W v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5825C versus DDR4-2133 on the Xeon E5-2687W v3 — the Ryzen 7 5825C supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2687W v3 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5825C) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2687W v3). PCIe lanes: 8 (Ryzen 7 5825C) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2687W v3) — the Xeon E5-2687W v3 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Ryzen 7 5825C) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2687W v3).

Feature	Ryzen 7 5825C	Xeon E5-2687W v3
Socket	FP6	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+50%	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	768 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	8	40+400%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 7 5825C) / not specified (Xeon E5-2687W v3). The Ryzen 7 5825C includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Xeon E5-2687W v3 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5825C	Xeon E5-2687W v3
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon Vega 8	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	Yes	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 7 5825C was priced at $400, while the Xeon E5-2687W v3 came in at $2141. On launch pricing ($400 vs $2141), Ryzen 7 5825C was $1741 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5825C delivers 36.4 pts/$ vs 6.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2687W v3 — making the Ryzen 7 5825C the 137.1% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5825C	Xeon E5-2687W v3
MSRP	$400-81%	$2141
Performance per Dollar	36.4+435%	6.8
Release Date	2022	2014

Search Ryzen 7 5825C on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2687W v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.