Ryzen 7 5825C vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

AMD

Ryzen 7 5825C

8 Cores16 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022
Ryzen family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······

Ryzen 7 5825C vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 5825C vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 5825C vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 5825C

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (14,561 vs 14,699).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.4 vs 44.7 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

2017

Why buy it

  • +0.9% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $71 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
  • Delivers 22.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.7 vs 36.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5825C across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 5825C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5825C better than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 7 5825C is ahead with a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 5825C is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 7 5825C comes in 21.6% more expensive on MSRP at $400 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.9% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is also 22.7% better value on MSRP (44.7 vs 36.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 5825C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 7 5825C vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen 7 5825C

The Ryzen 7 5825C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,561 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,699 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 5825C and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5825C versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 — a 19.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5825C (base: 2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5825C uses the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5825C scores 14,561 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700's 14,699 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureRyzen 7 5825CRyzen 7 PRO 1700
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz+22%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
3 GHz+50%
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
14,561
14,699
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,551
Geekbench 6 Single
1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi
7,145
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5825C uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 7 5825CRyzen 7 PRO 1700
Socket
FP6
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 7 5825C) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 1700). The Ryzen 7 5825C includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureRyzen 7 5825CRyzen 7 PRO 1700
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Vega 8
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 7 5825C was priced at $400, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 came in at $329. On launch pricing ($400 vs $329), Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 was $71 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5825C delivers 36.4 pts/$ vs 44.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 the 20.4% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 7 5825CRyzen 7 PRO 1700
MSRP
$400
$329-18%
Performance per Dollar
36.4
44.7+23%
Release Date
2022
2017

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.