Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Xeon E5-2658 v4

Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Xeon E5-2658 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 4600HS

6 / 12

14,349

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2658 v4

14 / 28

14,434

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Xeon E5-2658 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Xeon E5-2658 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 4600HS

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2658 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,349 vs 14,434).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 35 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2658 v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.

Xeon E5-2658 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+337.5% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.

Trade-offs

❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2658 v4 better than Ryzen 5 4600HS?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2658 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 4600HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2658 v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 16.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2658 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 337.5% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2658 v4 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2658 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 4600HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Xeon E5-2658 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 4600HS

The Ryzen 5 4600HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-4266. Passmark benchmark score: 14,349 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2658 v4

The Xeon E5-2658 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 14,434 points. Launch price was $1,832.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 4600HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2658 v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2658 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4600HS versus 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2658 v4 — a 54% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 4600HS. The Ryzen 5 4600HS uses the Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2658 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 4600HS scores 14,349 against the Xeon E5-2658 v4's 14,434 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2658 v4. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 4600HS vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2658 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 5 4600HS	Xeon E5-2658 v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	14 / 28+133%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+74%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	—
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	35 MB+338%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	3.5 MB+600%
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	14,349	14,434

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 4600HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2658 v4 uses FCLGA2011-3 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.