
Ryzen 5 4600HS

Xeon W-1290TE
Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Xeon W-1290TE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Xeon W-1290TE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Xeon W-1290TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 4600HS
2020Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-1290TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,349 vs 14,505).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1290TE, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 16 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon W-1290TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Xeon W-1290TE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 16 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics P630, while Ryzen 5 4600HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $552 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 4600HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-1290TE better than Ryzen 5 4600HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Xeon W-1290TE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 4600HS
The Ryzen 5 4600HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-4266. Passmark benchmark score: 14,349 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon W-1290TE
The Xeon W-1290TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,505 points. Launch price was $552.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 4600HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-1290TE offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon W-1290TE has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4600HS versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-1290TE — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1290TE (base: 3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 4600HS uses the Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-1290TE uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 4600HS scores 14,349 against the Xeon W-1290TE's 14,505 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon W-1290TE. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 4600HS vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1290TE.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 4600HS | Xeon W-1290TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 20+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+67% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 14,349 | 14,505+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,507 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,478 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 4600HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1290TE uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 4600HS | Xeon W-1290TE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 4600HS) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-1290TE). The Xeon W-1290TE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics P630), while the Ryzen 5 4600HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon W-1290TE targets Workstation.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 4600HS | Xeon W-1290TE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












