Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Xeon D-1732TE

Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Xeon D-1732TE Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 4600HS

6 / 12

14,349

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon D-1732TE

8 / 16

14,254

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Xeon D-1732TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Xeon D-1732TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 4600HS

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 52W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon D-1732TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1732TE, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon D-1732TE

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,254 vs 14,349).
❌48.6% higher power demand at 52W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 4600HS better than Xeon D-1732TE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1732TE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 4600HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 4600HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 4600HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 5 4600HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1732TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020) and 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Xeon D-1732TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 4600HS

The Ryzen 5 4600HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-4266. Passmark benchmark score: 14,349 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon D-1732TE

The Xeon D-1732TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 52 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,254 points. Launch price was $730.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 4600HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-1732TE offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon D-1732TE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4600HS versus 3 GHz on the Xeon D-1732TE — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 4600HS (base: 3 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Ryzen 5 4600HS uses the Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon D-1732TE uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 4600HS scores 14,349 against the Xeon D-1732TE's 14,254 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 4600HS. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 4600HS vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon D-1732TE.

Feature	Ryzen 5 4600HS	Xeon D-1732TE
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+33%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+58%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	15 MB (total)+88%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+150%
Process	7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020)	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
PassMark	14,349	14,254

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 4600HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1732TE uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.