Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Xeon E5-2697 v2

Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Xeon E5-2697 v2 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 4600HS

6 / 12

14,349

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2697 v2

12 / 24

14,267

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Xeon E5-2697 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Xeon E5-2697 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 4600HS

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2697 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2697 v2, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2697 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,267 vs 14,349).
❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 4600HS better than Xeon E5-2697 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2697 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 4600HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 4600HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 4600HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 5 4600HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 4600HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Xeon E5-2697 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 4600HS

The Ryzen 5 4600HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-4266. Passmark benchmark score: 14,349 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2697 v2

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 14,267 points. Launch price was $1,723.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 4600HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2697 v2 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2697 v2 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4600HS versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697 v2 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 4600HS (base: 3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 5 4600HS uses the Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2697 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 4600HS scores 14,349 against the Xeon E5-2697 v2's 14,267 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 4600HS. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 4600HS vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2697 v2.

Feature	Ryzen 5 4600HS	Xeon E5-2697 v2
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	12 / 24+100%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+14%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+11%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+275%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	14,349	14,267

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 4600HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2697 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.