Xeon E5-2689 v4 vs Xeon W-2140B

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2689 v4 vs Xeon W-2140B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2689 v4 vs Xeon W-2140B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2689 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+127.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 11 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (17,084 vs 17,319).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 58.9 PassMark/$ ($2,723 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
❌37.5% higher power demand at 165W vs 120W.

Xeon W-2140B

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,429 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $2,723 MSRP).
✅Delivers 838.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.9 vs 6.3 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $2,723 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 165W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 25 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2140B better than Xeon E5-2689 v4?

Yes. Xeon W-2140B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-2140B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2140B is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-2140B is the better buy right now. Xeon W-2140B comes in $2,429 cheaper on MSRP at $294 MSRP versus $2,723 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 838.9% better value on MSRP (58.9 vs 6.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-2140B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2689 v4 vs Xeon W-2140B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2689 v4

The Xeon E5-2689 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,084 points. Launch price was $2,723.

Xeon W-2140B

The Xeon W-2140B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 17,319 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2689 v4 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon W-2140B offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2689 v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2689 v4 versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon W-2140B — a 10% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2140B (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-2689 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-2140B uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2689 v4 scores 17,084 against the Xeon W-2140B's 17,319 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon W-2140B. L3 cache: 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2689 v4 vs 11 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2140B.

Feature	Xeon E5-2689 v4	Xeon W-2140B
Cores / Threads	10 / 20+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	4.2 GHz+11%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	25 MB+127%	11 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2.5 MB+150%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	17,084	17,319+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2689 v4 uses the LGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2140B uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-2689 v4	Xeon W-2140B
Socket	LGA2011-3	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-2689 v4 was priced at $2723, while the Xeon W-2140B came in at $294. On launch pricing ($2723 vs $294), Xeon W-2140B was $2429 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2689 v4 delivers 6.3 pts/$ vs 58.9 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2140B — making the Xeon W-2140B the 161.5% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-2689 v4	Xeon W-2140B
MSRP	$2723	$294-89%
Performance per Dollar	6.3	58.9+835%
Release Date	2016	2017

Search Xeon E5-2689 v4 on Amazon

Search Xeon W-2140B on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.