Xeon E5-2697 v2
VS
Core i7-9700KF

Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Core i7-9700KF

Intel

Xeon E5-2697 v2

12 Cores24 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i7-9700KF

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2697 v2

#169
Xeon E-2356G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $544
104%
#171
Xeon W-2140B
MSRP: $294|Avg: $99
103%
#176
Xeon 6325P
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
102%
#178
Xeon Silver 4510
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
102%
#179
Xeon W-3223
MSRP: $294|Avg: $294
101%
#182
EPYC Embedded 8224P
MSRP: $855|Avg: $1048
100%
#183
Xeon E5-2697 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#187
Xeon Gold 5520+
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
99%
#188
EPYC 8124P
MSRP: $639|Avg: $639
99%
#196
Xeon 6515P
MSRP: $740|Avg: $886
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-9700KF

#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
105%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
105%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
105%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
105%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
105%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
105%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
104%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
104%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
104%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
103%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
102%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
102%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
101%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
101%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
100%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
100%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
97%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
97%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
91%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
91%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
90%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
87%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
85%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
83%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
81%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
81%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
77%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
76%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
76%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
71%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
66%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i7-9700KF (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2697 v2Core i7-9700KF
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($333)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2697 v2Core i7-9700KF
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($333)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core i7-9700KF

Intel

Xeon E5-2697 v2

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 14,267 points. Launch price was $1,723.

Intel

Core i7-9700KF

The Core i7-9700KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 14,250 points. Launch price was $374.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Core i7-9700KF offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2697 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697 v2 versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700KF — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700KF (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon E5-2697 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-9700KF uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2697 v2 scores 14,267 against the Core i7-9700KF's 14,250 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2697 v2. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700KF.

FeatureXeon E5-2697 v2Core i7-9700KF
Cores / Threads
12 / 24+50%
8 / 8
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
4.9 GHz+40%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
3.6 GHz+33%
L3 Cache
30 MB (total)+150%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark
14,267
14,250
Geekbench 6 Single
1,659
Geekbench 6 Multi
7,072
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-9700KF uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-2697 v2 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700KF — the Core i7-9700KF supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2697 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-2697 v2) vs 2 (Core i7-9700KF). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-2697 v2) vs 16 (Core i7-9700KF) — the Xeon E5-2697 v2 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2697 v2) and LGA1151 (Core i7-9700KF).

FeatureXeon E5-2697 v2Core i7-9700KF
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR4-2666+33%
Max RAM Capacity
768 GB+500%
128 GB
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40+150%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2697 v2) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700KF).

FeatureXeon E5-2697 v2Core i7-9700KF
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d