Xeon E5-2697 v2
VS
Xeon W-1290TE

Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Xeon W-1290TE

Intel

Xeon E5-2697 v2

12 Cores24 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Xeon W-1290TE

10 Cores20 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2697 v2

#169
Xeon E-2356G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $544
104%
#171
Xeon W-2140B
MSRP: $294|Avg: $99
103%
#176
Xeon 6325P
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
102%
#178
Xeon Silver 4510
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
102%
#179
Xeon W-3223
MSRP: $294|Avg: $294
101%
#182
EPYC Embedded 8224P
MSRP: $855|Avg: $1048
100%
#183
Xeon E5-2697 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#187
Xeon Gold 5520+
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
99%
#188
EPYC 8124P
MSRP: $639|Avg: $639
99%
#196
Xeon 6515P
MSRP: $740|Avg: $886
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-1290TE

#311
Xeon w7-3545
MSRP: $2039|Avg: $2039
109%
#312
EPYC 7643P
MSRP: $2722|Avg: $2722
108%
#313
Xeon w5-3435X
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $163
108%
#314
Xeon Gold 6312U
MSRP: $1645|Avg: N/A
108%
#315
EPYC 7443
MSRP: $2010|Avg: $1800
107%
#316
Xeon Gold 6416H
MSRP: $1845|Avg: N/A
107%
#318
EPYC 7343
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $1350
106%
#319
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $225
106%
#320
EPYC 7413
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $450
106%
#321
Xeon W-3335
MSRP: $1430|Avg: $1200
105%
#322
EPYC 9354P
MSRP: $2730|Avg: $2205
104%
#323
EPYC 9224
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $1199
101%
#324
Xeon Gold 6423N
MSRP: $2161|Avg: $2161
101%
#325
Xeon w7-3565X
MSRP: $2689|Avg: $2850
100%
#326
Xeon W-1290TE
MSRP: $552|Avg: $552
100%
#328
Xeon w7-2495X
MSRP: $2189|Avg: $2900
99%
#329
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
MSRP: $4099|Avg: $4182
99%
#331
EPYC 7402
MSRP: $1783|Avg: $2285
98%
#332
Xeon W-2235
MSRP: $555|Avg: $350
98%
#333
Xeon Gold 5317
MSRP: $1088|Avg: $1100
96%
#334
Xeon W-2275
MSRP: $1112|Avg: $500
96%
#335
Xeon Gold 6430
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $1850
95%
#336
Xeon Gold 6421N
MSRP: $2368|Avg: $2427
94%
#337
EPYC 7F72
MSRP: $2131|Avg: $2131
94%
#338
Xeon W-2265
MSRP: $1039|Avg: $663
94%
#339
Xeon w7-3555
MSRP: $2749|Avg: $2199
94%
#340
Xeon w7-3445
MSRP: $1989|Avg: $2596
94%
#341
EPYC 9275F
MSRP: $3439|Avg: $3439
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Xeon W-1290TE (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2697 v2Xeon W-1290TE
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($552)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2697 v2Xeon W-1290TE
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($552)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon W-1290TE

Intel

Xeon E5-2697 v2

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 14,267 points. Launch price was $1,723.

Intel

Xeon W-1290TE

The Xeon W-1290TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,505 points. Launch price was $552.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-1290TE offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2697 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697 v2 versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-1290TE — a 25% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1290TE (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2697 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon W-1290TE uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2697 v2 scores 14,267 against the Xeon W-1290TE's 14,505 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon W-1290TE. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1290TE.

FeatureXeon E5-2697 v2Xeon W-1290TE
Cores / Threads
12 / 24+20%
10 / 20
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
4.5 GHz+29%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+50%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
30 MB (total)+50%
20 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark
14,267
14,505+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,507
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,478
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1290TE uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-2697 v2 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-1290TE — the Xeon W-1290TE supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2697 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-2697 v2) vs 2 (Xeon W-1290TE). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-2697 v2) vs 16 (Xeon W-1290TE) — the Xeon E5-2697 v2 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2697 v2) and W480 (Xeon W-1290TE).

FeatureXeon E5-2697 v2Xeon W-1290TE
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR4-2933+33%
Max RAM Capacity
768 GB+500%
128 GB
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40+150%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2697 v2) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-1290TE). The Xeon W-1290TE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics P630), while the Xeon E5-2697 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon W-1290TE targets Workstation.

FeatureXeon E5-2697 v2Xeon W-1290TE
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics P630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Workstation