
Xeon E5-2697 v2

Xeon W-1290TE
Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Xeon W-1290TE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Xeon W-1290TE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Xeon W-1290TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon E5-2697 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅150% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,267 vs 14,505).
- ❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon W-1290TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Xeon W-1290TE
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics P630, while Xeon E5-2697 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2697 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $552 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2697 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-1290TE better than Xeon E5-2697 v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Xeon W-1290TE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2697 v2
The Xeon E5-2697 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 14,267 points. Launch price was $1,723.

Xeon W-1290TE
The Xeon W-1290TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,505 points. Launch price was $552.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2697 v2 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-1290TE offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2697 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697 v2 versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-1290TE — a 25% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1290TE (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2697 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon W-1290TE uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2697 v2 scores 14,267 against the Xeon W-1290TE's 14,505 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon W-1290TE. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1290TE.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2697 v2 | Xeon W-1290TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+20% | 10 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.5 GHz+29% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+50% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+50% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 14,267 | 14,505+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,507 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,478 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2697 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1290TE uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-2697 v2 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-1290TE — the Xeon W-1290TE supports 57.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2697 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-2697 v2) vs 2 (Xeon W-1290TE). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-2697 v2) vs 16 (Xeon W-1290TE) — the Xeon E5-2697 v2 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2697 v2) and W480 (Xeon W-1290TE).
| Feature | Xeon E5-2697 v2 | Xeon W-1290TE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | DDR4-2933+57% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768 GB+500% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 40+150% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2697 v2) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-1290TE). The Xeon W-1290TE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics P630), while the Xeon E5-2697 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon W-1290TE targets Workstation.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2697 v2 | Xeon W-1290TE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













