Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Xeon W-1290TE

Intel

Xeon E5-2697 v2

12 Cores24 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon W-1290TE

10 Cores20 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······

Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Xeon W-1290TE Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Xeon W-1290TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Xeon W-1290TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2697 v2

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
  • 150% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (14,267 vs 14,505).
  • 271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Xeon W-1290TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Xeon W-1290TE

2020

Why buy it

  • +1.7% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics P630, while Xeon E5-2697 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2697 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $552 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2697 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-1290TE better than Xeon E5-2697 v2?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2697 v2 is ahead with a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-1290TE pulls ahead with 1.7% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2697 v2 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-1290TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon W-1290TE is the better buy right now. Xeon W-1290TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $552 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2697 v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (26.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon W-1290TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Xeon W-1290TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon E5-2697 v2

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 14,267 points. Launch price was $1,723.

Intel

Xeon W-1290TE

The Xeon W-1290TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,505 points. Launch price was $552.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-1290TE offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2697 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697 v2 versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-1290TE — a 25% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1290TE (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2697 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon W-1290TE uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2697 v2 scores 14,267 against the Xeon W-1290TE's 14,505 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon W-1290TE. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1290TE.

FeatureXeon E5-2697 v2Xeon W-1290TE
Cores / Threads
12 / 24+20%
10 / 20
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
4.5 GHz+29%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+50%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
30 MB (total)+50%
20 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark
14,267
14,505+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,507
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,478
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1290TE uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-2697 v2 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-1290TE — the Xeon W-1290TE supports 57.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2697 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-2697 v2) vs 2 (Xeon W-1290TE). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-2697 v2) vs 16 (Xeon W-1290TE) — the Xeon E5-2697 v2 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2697 v2) and W480 (Xeon W-1290TE).

FeatureXeon E5-2697 v2Xeon W-1290TE
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR4-2933+57%
Max RAM Capacity
768 GB+500%
128 GB
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
40+150%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2697 v2) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-1290TE). The Xeon W-1290TE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics P630), while the Xeon E5-2697 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon W-1290TE targets Workstation.

FeatureXeon E5-2697 v2Xeon W-1290TE
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics P630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Workstation