Xeon E5-2697 v2
VS
Core i5-11600T

Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Core i5-11600T

Intel

Xeon E5-2697 v2

12 Cores24 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i5-11600T

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2697 v2

#169
Xeon E-2356G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $544
104%
#171
Xeon W-2140B
MSRP: $294|Avg: $99
103%
#176
Xeon 6325P
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
102%
#178
Xeon Silver 4510
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
102%
#179
Xeon W-3223
MSRP: $294|Avg: $294
101%
#182
EPYC Embedded 8224P
MSRP: $855|Avg: $1048
100%
#183
Xeon E5-2697 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#187
Xeon Gold 5520+
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
99%
#188
EPYC 8124P
MSRP: $639|Avg: $639
99%
#196
Xeon 6515P
MSRP: $740|Avg: $886
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-11600T

#314
Core i7-10700
MSRP: $365|Avg: $268
109%
#315
Core i5-9600K
MSRP: $263|Avg: $178
108%
#316
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1400
108%
#317
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
108%
#318
Core i3-10305T
MSRP: $143|Avg: $143
108%
#319
Ryzen Embedded V1202B
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
106%
#320
Core i3-10100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $146
106%
#321
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
106%
#322
Celeron G6900
MSRP: $52|Avg: $77
105%
#323
Core i9-11900K
MSRP: $539|Avg: $435
104%
#324
Core i7-12700TE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $350
102%
#325
Core i9-12900E
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
102%
#326
Celeron G4900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $40
102%
#327
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $452
101%
#328
Core i9-9900KS
MSRP: $513|Avg: $350
101%
#329
Core i5-11600T
MSRP: $262|Avg: $262
100%
#330
Core i9-9900K
MSRP: $488|Avg: $331
99%
#331
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
MSRP: $899|Avg: $540
99%
#332
Celeron G4930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
99%
#333
Core i9-9920X
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $464
98%
#334
Core i3-9100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $125
96%
#335
Core i9-10900X
MSRP: $590|Avg: $425
95%
#336
Core i7-8700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $196
95%
#337
Ryzen 5 3600XT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $357
94%
#338
Core i9-10980XE
MSRP: $979|Avg: $620
94%
#339
Core i5-8500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $149
94%
#340
Core i9-9900KF
MSRP: $488|Avg: $350
93%
#341
Ryzen Embedded V2748
MSRP: $309|Avg: $359
93%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
92%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
90%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-11600T (2021) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-3200, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2697 v2Core i5-11600T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($262)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Rocket Lake (2021) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2697 v2Core i5-11600T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($262)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core i5-11600T

Intel

Xeon E5-2697 v2

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 14,267 points. Launch price was $1,723.

Intel

Core i5-11600T

The Core i5-11600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,447 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Core i5-11600T offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2697 v2 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697 v2 versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-11600T — a 15.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-11600T (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Xeon E5-2697 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-11600T uses Rocket Lake (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2697 v2 scores 14,267 against the Core i5-11600T's 14,447 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i5-11600T. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11600T.

FeatureXeon E5-2697 v2Core i5-11600T
Cores / Threads
12 / 24+100%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
4.1 GHz+17%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+59%
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
30 MB (total)+150%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
Rocket Lake (2021)
PassMark
14,267
14,447+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,856
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,455
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-11600T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-2697 v2 versus DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-11600T — the Core i5-11600T supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2697 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-2697 v2) vs 2 (Core i5-11600T). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-2697 v2) vs 20 (Core i5-11600T) — the Xeon E5-2697 v2 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2697 v2) and H470,Z490,B560,Z590 (Core i5-11600T).

FeatureXeon E5-2697 v2Core i5-11600T
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR4-3200+33%
Max RAM Capacity
768 GB+500%
128 GB
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40+100%
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2697 v2) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-11600T). The Core i5-11600T includes integrated graphics (UHD 750), while the Xeon E5-2697 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11600T targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-11600T rivals Ryzen 5 5600G.

FeatureXeon E5-2697 v2Core i5-11600T
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD 750
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming