Xeon E5-4607 v2 vs Xeon E5-4640

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-4607 v2 vs Xeon E5-4640 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-4607 v2 vs Xeon E5-4640: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-4607 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,683 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $2,725 MSRP).
✅Delivers 6364.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 166.3 vs 2.6 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $2,725 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,986 vs 7,012).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 20 MB).

Xeon E5-4640

2012

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 15 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 166.3 PassMark/$ ($2,725 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-4640 better than Xeon E5-4607 v2?

Yes. Xeon E5-4640 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-4640 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4640 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 15 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-4640 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-4607 v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-4640 comes in 6388.1% more expensive on MSRP at $2,725 MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-4607 v2 is also 6364.0% better value on MSRP (166.3 vs 2.6 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-4607 v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-4607 v2 vs Xeon E5-4640 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-4607 v2

The Xeon E5-4607 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 6,986 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-4640

The Xeon E5-4640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,012 points. Launch price was $2,730.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-4607 v2 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4640 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-4640 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4607 v2 versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-4640 — a 7.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-4640 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon E5-4640 is built on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-4607 v2 scores 6,986 against the Xeon E5-4640's 7,012 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-4640. L3 cache: 15 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon E5-4607 v2 vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-4640.

Feature	Xeon E5-4607 v2	Xeon E5-4640
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	2.8 GHz+8%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+8%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	15 MB Intel® Smart Cache	20480 kB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	—	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	—	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	6,986	7,012

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Xeon E5-4607 v2	Xeon E5-4640
Socket	LGA2011	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-4607 v2 was priced at $42, while the Xeon E5-4640 came in at $2725. On launch pricing ($42 vs $2725), Xeon E5-4607 v2 was $2683 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-4607 v2 delivers 166.3 pts/$ vs 2.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4640 — making the Xeon E5-4607 v2 the 193.9% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-4607 v2	Xeon E5-4640
MSRP	$42-98%	$2725
Performance per Dollar	166.3+6296%	2.6
Release Date	2014	2012

Search Xeon E5-4607 v2 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-4640 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.