Xeon E5-4607 v2 vs Xeon W3680

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-4607 v2 vs Xeon W3680 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-4607 v2 vs Xeon W3680: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-4607 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Costs $552 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1306.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 166.3 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 130W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,986 vs 7,025).

Xeon W3680

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4607 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 166.3 PassMark/$ ($594 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌36.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 95W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-4607 v2 better than Xeon W3680?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-4607 v2 is ahead with a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W3680 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. Xeon E5-4607 v2 also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W3680 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-4607 v2 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-4607 v2 comes in $552 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $594 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon W3680 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 1306.4% better value on MSRP (166.3 vs 11.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-4607 v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2010) and 25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-4607 v2 vs Xeon W3680 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-4607 v2

The Xeon E5-4607 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 6,986 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W3680

The Xeon W3680 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,025 points. Launch price was $350.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-4607 v2 and Xeon W3680 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4607 v2 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon W3680 — a 32.3% clock advantage for the Xeon W3680 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Xeon W3680 is built on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-4607 v2 scores 6,986 against the Xeon W3680's 7,025 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon W3680. L3 cache: 15 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon E5-4607 v2 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W3680.

Feature	Xeon E5-4607 v2	Xeon W3680
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	3.6 GHz+38%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.33 GHz+28%
L3 Cache	15 MB Intel® Smart Cache+25%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	—	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	—	Gulftown (2010−2011)
PassMark	6,986	7,025

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-4607 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3680 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-4607 v2	Xeon W3680
Socket	LGA2011	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-4607 v2 was priced at $42, while the Xeon W3680 came in at $594. On launch pricing ($42 vs $594), Xeon E5-4607 v2 was $552 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-4607 v2 delivers 166.3 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W3680 — making the Xeon E5-4607 v2 the 173.4% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-4607 v2	Xeon W3680
MSRP	$42-93%	$594
Performance per Dollar	166.3+1309%	11.8
Release Date	2014	2010

Search Xeon E5-4607 v2 on Amazon

Search Xeon W3680 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.