Xeon E5-4607 v2 vs Xeon X5690

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-4607 v2 vs Xeon X5690 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-4607 v2 vs Xeon X5690: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-4607 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Costs $208 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 491.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 166.3 vs 28.1 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 130W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,986 vs 7,031).

Xeon X5690

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 28.1 vs 166.3 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌36.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 95W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5690 better than Xeon E5-4607 v2?

Yes. Xeon X5690 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5690 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5690 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X5690 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-4607 v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon X5690 comes in 495.2% more expensive on MSRP at $250 MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-4607 v2 is also 491.4% better value on MSRP (166.3 vs 28.1 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-4607 v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011) and 25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-4607 v2 vs Xeon X5690 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-4607 v2

The Xeon E5-4607 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 6,986 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon X5690

The Xeon X5690 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.46 GHz, with boost up to 3.73 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,031 points. Launch price was $205.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-4607 v2 and Xeon X5690 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4607 v2 versus 3.73 GHz on the Xeon X5690 — a 35.7% clock advantage for the Xeon X5690 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.46 GHz). The Xeon X5690 is built on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-4607 v2 scores 6,986 against the Xeon X5690's 7,031 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon X5690. L3 cache: 15 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon E5-4607 v2 vs 12288 kB (total) on the Xeon X5690.

Feature	Xeon E5-4607 v2	Xeon X5690
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	3.73 GHz+43%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.46 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	15 MB Intel® Smart Cache+25%	12288 kB (total)
L2 Cache	—	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	—	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	6,986	7,031
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	3,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-4607 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5690 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-4607 v2	Xeon X5690
Socket	LGA2011	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
RAM Channels	—	3
ECC Support	—	Yes

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-4607 v2) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5690). Primary use case: Xeon X5690 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5690 rivals Core i7-980X.

Feature	Xeon E5-4607 v2	Xeon X5690
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-4607 v2 was priced at $42, while the Xeon X5690 came in at $250. On launch pricing ($42 vs $250), Xeon E5-4607 v2 was $208 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-4607 v2 delivers 166.3 pts/$ vs 28.1 pts/$ for the Xeon X5690 — making the Xeon E5-4607 v2 the 142.1% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-4607 v2	Xeon X5690
MSRP	$42-83%	$250
Performance per Dollar	166.3+492%	28.1
Release Date	2014	2011

Search Xeon E5-4607 v2 on Amazon

Search Xeon X5690 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.