Xeon E7-8895 v2 vs Xeon W-3365

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E7-8895 v2 vs Xeon W-3365 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E7-8895 v2 vs Xeon W-3365: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E7-8895 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 155W instead of 270W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3365 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (57,165 vs 57,312).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (38 MB vs 48 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($6,841 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).

Xeon W-3365

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+28% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 38 MB).
✅Costs $3,342 less on MSRP ($3,499 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
✅Delivers 96.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
✅60% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 40) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌74.2% higher power demand at 270W vs 155W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3365 better than Xeon E7-8895 v2?

Yes. Xeon W-3365 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 13.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3365 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3365 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 28% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 38 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3365 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-3365 comes in $3,342 cheaper on MSRP at $3,499 MSRP versus $6,841 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 96.0% better value on MSRP (16.4 vs 8.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-3365 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2014), 28% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 38 MB), more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 15/30, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E7-8895 v2 vs Xeon W-3365 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E7-8895 v2

The Xeon E7-8895 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2014-02-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 57,165 points. Launch price was $6,841.

Xeon W-3365

The Xeon W-3365 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 57,312 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E7-8895 v2 packs 15 cores / 30 threads, while the Xeon W-3365 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon W-3365 has 17 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E7-8895 v2 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3365 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3365 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Xeon W-3365 is built on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E7-8895 v2 scores 57,165 against the Xeon W-3365's 57,312 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon W-3365. L3 cache: 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-8895 v2 vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3365.

Feature	Xeon E7-8895 v2	Xeon W-3365
Cores / Threads	15 / 30	32 / 64+113%
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	4 GHz+11%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+4%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	37.5 MB	48 MB (total)+28%
L2 Cache	—	1 MB (per core)
Process	22 nm	10 nm-55%
Architecture	—	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	57,165	57,312
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,960
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	16,817

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E7-8895 v2 uses the FCLGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-3365 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Xeon E7-8895 v2 versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon W-3365 — the Xeon W-3365 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3365 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1536 GB — 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E7-8895 v2) vs 8 (Xeon W-3365). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E7-8895 v2) vs 64 (Xeon W-3365) — the Xeon W-3365 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C602-J (Xeon E7-8895 v2) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3365).

Feature	Xeon E7-8895 v2	Xeon W-3365
Socket	FCLGA2011	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	1600	DDR4-3200+100%
Max RAM Capacity	1536 GB	4096 GB+167%
RAM Channels	4	8+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	40	64+60%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3365 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E7-8895 v2) vs true (Xeon W-3365). Direct competitor: Xeon E7-8895 v2 rivals AMD Opteron 6386 SE; Xeon W-3365 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	Xeon E7-8895 v2	Xeon W-3365
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E7-8895 v2 was priced at $6841, while the Xeon W-3365 came in at $3499. On launch pricing ($6841 vs $3499), Xeon W-3365 was $3342 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E7-8895 v2 delivers 8.4 pts/$ vs 16.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3365 — making the Xeon W-3365 the 64.9% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E7-8895 v2	Xeon W-3365
MSRP	$6841	$3499-49%
Performance per Dollar	8.4	16.4+95%
Release Date	2014	2021

Search Xeon E7-8895 v2 on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3365 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.