Xeon E7-8895 v2 vs Xeon w5-3535X

Intel

Xeon E7-8895 v2

15 Cores30 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon w5-3535X

20 Cores40 Thrd300 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······

Xeon E7-8895 v2 vs Xeon w5-3535X Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E7-8895 v2 vs Xeon w5-3535X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E7-8895 v2 vs Xeon w5-3535X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E7-8895 v2

2014

Why buy it

  • +2.9% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 155W instead of 300W, a 145W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-3535X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (38 MB vs 53 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 32.7 PassMark/$ ($6,841 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
  • Older platform position on FCLGA2011, while Xeon w5-3535X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w5-3535X

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +21.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +40% larger total L3 cache (53 MB vs 38 MB).
  • Costs $5,142 less on MSRP ($1,699 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
  • Delivers 291.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.7 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
  • Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA2011 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (55,532 vs 57,165).
  • 93.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 155W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w5-3535X better than Xeon E7-8895 v2?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon w5-3535X is ahead with a 21.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-8895 v2 pulls ahead with 2.9% better PassMark. Xeon w5-3535X also has the bigger cache pool with 40% larger total L3 cache (53 MB vs 38 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-8895 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.9% better PassMark, backed by 15 cores and 30 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon w5-3535X is the better buy right now. Xeon w5-3535X comes in $5,142 cheaper on MSRP at $1,699 MSRP versus $6,841 MSRP, and it still gives you a 21.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E7-8895 v2 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.9% better PassMark. It is also 291.1% better value on MSRP (32.7 vs 8.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon w5-3535X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2014), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of FCLGA2011, 40% larger total L3 cache (53 MB vs 38 MB), and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon E7-8895 v2 vs Xeon w5-3535X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon E7-8895 v2

The Xeon E7-8895 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2014-02-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 57,165 points. Launch price was $6,841.

Intel

Xeon w5-3535X

The Xeon w5-3535X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 55,532 points. Launch price was $1,689.

Processing Power

The Xeon E7-8895 v2 packs 15 cores / 30 threads, while the Xeon w5-3535X offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon w5-3535X has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E7-8895 v2 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w5-3535X — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-3535X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon w5-3535X is built on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E7-8895 v2 scores 57,165 against the Xeon w5-3535X's 55,532 — a 2.9% lead for the Xeon E7-8895 v2. L3 cache: 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-8895 v2 vs 52.5 MB on the Xeon w5-3535X.

FeatureXeon E7-8895 v2Xeon w5-3535X
Cores / Threads
15 / 30
20 / 40+33%
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
4.8 GHz+33%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
2.9 GHz+4%
L3 Cache
37.5 MB
52.5 MB+40%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
Process
22 nm
Intel 7 nm-68%
Architecture
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
57,165+3%
55,532
Geekbench 6 Single
2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi
30,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E7-8895 v2 uses the FCLGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon w5-3535X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Xeon E7-8895 v2 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w5-3535X — the Xeon w5-3535X supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w5-3535X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1536 GB 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E7-8895 v2) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3535X) — the Xeon w5-3535X offers 72 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C602-J (Xeon E7-8895 v2) and W790 (Xeon w5-3535X).

FeatureXeon E7-8895 v2Xeon w5-3535X
Socket
FCLGA2011
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
1600
DDR5-4800+200%
Max RAM Capacity
1536 GB
4096 GB+167%
RAM Channels
4
4
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
40
112+180%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w5-3535X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon w5-3535X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon w5-3535X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon E7-8895 v2 rivals AMD Opteron 6386 SE; Xeon w5-3535X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

FeatureXeon E7-8895 v2Xeon w5-3535X
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E7-8895 v2 was priced at $6841, while the Xeon w5-3535X came in at $1699. On launch pricing ($6841 vs $1699), Xeon w5-3535X was $5142 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E7-8895 v2 delivers 8.4 pts/$ vs 32.7 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-3535X — making the Xeon w5-3535X the 118.6% better value option.

FeatureXeon E7-8895 v2Xeon w5-3535X
MSRP
$6841
$1699-75%
Performance per Dollar
8.4
32.7+289%
Release Date
2014
2024

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.