PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6138T vs Xeon W-2150B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6138T vs Xeon W-2150B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6138T

2017

Why buy it

✅+44% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 14 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2150B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.4 vs 41.1 PassMark/$ ($2,742 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Xeon W-2150B

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,243 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,742 MSRP).
✅Delivers 453.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 41.1 vs 7.4 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,742 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 125W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (8,324 vs 11,988).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (14 MB vs 28 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2150B better than Xeon Gold 6138T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-2150B is ahead with a 12.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6138T pulls ahead with 44% better Geekbench multi-core. Xeon Gold 6138T also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 14 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6138T is the stronger fit. You are getting 44% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 14 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-2150B is the better buy right now. Xeon W-2150B comes in $2,243 cheaper on MSRP at $499 MSRP versus $2,742 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6138T is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 44% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 453.0% better value on MSRP (41.1 vs 7.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6138T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 100% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 14 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 20 cores / 40 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Gold 6138T vs Xeon W-2150B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 6138T

The Xeon Gold 6138T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 20,356 points. Launch price was $2,742.

Xeon W-2150B

The Xeon W-2150B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 13.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 20,486 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6138T packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon W-2150B offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon Gold 6138T has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6138T versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-2150B — a 19.5% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2150B (base: 2 GHz vs 3 GHz). Both are built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6138T scores 20,356 against the Xeon W-2150B's 20,486 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon W-2150B. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,030 vs 1,410, a 31.1% lead for the Xeon W-2150B that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,988 vs 8,324 (36.1% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6138T). L3 cache: 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6138T vs 13.75 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2150B.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6138T	Xeon W-2150B
Cores / Threads	20 / 40+100%	10 / 20
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4.5 GHz+22%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3 GHz+50%
L3 Cache	27.5 MB+100%	13.75 MB (total)
L2 Cache	20 MB+1900%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	20,356	20,486
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	11,463
Geekbench 6 Single	1,030	1,410+37%
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,988+44%	8,324

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 6138T uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2150B uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 6138T supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 512 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Gold 6138T) vs 4 (Xeon W-2150B). Both provide 48 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C620 (Xeon Gold 6138T) and C422 (Xeon W-2150B).

Feature	Xeon Gold 6138T	Xeon W-2150B
Socket	LGA3647	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	768 GB+50%	512 GB
RAM Channels	6+50%	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	48	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: Yes (Xeon Gold 6138T) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-2150B).

Feature	Xeon Gold 6138T	Xeon W-2150B
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	Yes	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Gold 6138T was priced at $2742, while the Xeon W-2150B came in at $499. On launch pricing ($2742 vs $499), Xeon W-2150B was $2243 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6138T delivers 7.4 pts/$ vs 41.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2150B — making the Xeon W-2150B the 138.7% better value option.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6138T	Xeon W-2150B
MSRP	$2742	$499-82%
Performance per Dollar	7.4	41.1+455%
Release Date	2017	2017

Search Xeon Gold 6138T on Amazon

Search Xeon W-2150B on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.