
Xeon Gold 6238R

Xeon W-3265M
Xeon Gold 6238R vs Xeon W-3265M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon Gold 6238R vs Xeon W-3265M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon Gold 6238R vs Xeon W-3265M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon Gold 6238R
2020Why buy it
- β Costs $3,688 less on MSRP ($2,612 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- β Delivers 136.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.3 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($2,612 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- β Draws 165W instead of 205W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3265M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (34,751 vs 35,506).
Xeon W-3265M
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +19.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 13.3 PassMark/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $2,612 MSRP).
- β24.2% higher power demand at 205W vs 165W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-3265M better than Xeon Gold 6238R?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 6238R vs Xeon W-3265M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 6238R
The Xeon Gold 6238R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019β2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 34,751 points. Launch price was $2,612.

Xeon W-3265M
The Xeon W-3265M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019β2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,506 points. Launch price was $6,353.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6238R packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the Xeon W-3265M offers 24 cores / 48 threads β the Xeon Gold 6238R has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6238R versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3265M β a 14% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3265M (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). Both are built on the Cascade Lake (2019β2020) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6238R scores 34,751 against the Xeon W-3265M's 35,506 β a 2.1% lead for the Xeon W-3265M. L3 cache: 38.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6238R vs 33 MB on the Xeon W-3265M.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6238R | Xeon W-3265M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 28 / 56+17% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.6 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz+23% |
| L3 Cache | 38.5 MB+17% | 33 MB |
| L2 Cache | 28 MB+17% | 24 MB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019β2020) | Cascade Lake (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 34,751 | 35,506+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 21,433 | β |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Xeon W-3265M supports up to 1024 TB of RAM compared to 1 TB β 102300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Gold 6238R) vs 64 (Xeon W-3265M) β the Xeon W-3265M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621,C622,C624,C627,C628 (Xeon Gold 6238R) and C620 (Xeon W-3265M).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6238R | Xeon W-3265M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | 2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1 TB | 1024 TB+102300% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 6 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | 64+33% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6238R) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3265M). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6238R targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6238R rivals Xeon Gold 6248R; Xeon W-3265M rivals EPYC 7402.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6238R | Xeon W-3265M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | β | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Server | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon Gold 6238R was priced at $2612, while the Xeon W-3265M came in at $6300. On launch pricing ($2612 vs $6300), Xeon Gold 6238R was $3688 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6238R delivers 13.3 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3265M β making the Xeon Gold 6238R the 81% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6238R | Xeon W-3265M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2612-59% | $6300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.3+138% | 5.6 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















