Xeon Gold 6312U vs EPYC 7F52
Xeon Gold 6312U
EPYC 7F52
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 6312U
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7F52
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Gold 6312U | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($1,645) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,826) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake-SP (2021) / 10 nm) | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Gold 6312U | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+14%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($1,645) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,826) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6312U and EPYC 7F52
Xeon Gold 6312U
The Xeon Gold 6312U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 42,443 points. Launch price was $800.
EPYC 7F52
The EPYC 7F52 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,388 points. Launch price was $3,100.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6312U packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 7F52 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6312U has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6312U versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7F52 — a 8% clock advantage for the EPYC 7F52 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6312U uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 7F52 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6312U scores 42,443 against the EPYC 7F52's 41,388 — a 2.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6312U. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6312U vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F52.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6312U | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.9 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz+46% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+611% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 42,443+3% | 41,388 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 6312U uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7F52 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 6312U supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Gold 6312U) vs 128 (EPYC 7F52) — the EPYC 7F52 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Gold 6312U) and SP3 (EPYC 7F52).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6312U | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144+50% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 128+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6312U) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7F52). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6312U rivals EPYC 7413; EPYC 7F52 rivals Xeon Gold 6248.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6312U | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Gold 6312U launched at $1645 MSRP, while the EPYC 7F52 debuted at $3100.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6312U | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1645-47% | $3100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $1826 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon Gold 6312U and EPYC 7F52
