Xeon Gold 6416H vs Xeon W-3275
Xeon Gold 6416H
Xeon W-3275
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 6416H
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3275
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Gold 6416H | Xeon W-3275 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,845) | ✅ More affordable ($1,550) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Gold 6416H | Xeon W-3275 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+21%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,845) | ✅ More affordable ($1,550) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6416H and Xeon W-3275
Xeon Gold 6416H
The Xeon Gold 6416H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,606 points. Launch price was $1,444.
Xeon W-3275
The Xeon W-3275 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 41,267 points. Launch price was $4,449.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6416H packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Xeon W-3275 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon W-3275 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6416H versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3275 — a 9.1% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3275 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6416H uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-3275 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6416H scores 40,606 against the Xeon W-3275's 41,267 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon W-3275. L3 cache: 45 MB on the Xeon Gold 6416H vs 38.5 MB on the Xeon W-3275.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6416H | Xeon W-3275 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 18 / 36 | 28 / 56+56% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.6 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz+14% |
| L3 Cache | 45 MB+17% | 38.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 28 MB+1300% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 40,606 | 41,267+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 6416H uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3275 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6416H versus 3200 on the Xeon W-3275 — the Xeon Gold 6416H supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6416H supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1024 — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon Gold 6416H) vs 6 (Xeon W-3275). PCIe lanes: 80 (Xeon Gold 6416H) vs 64 (Xeon W-3275) — the Xeon Gold 6416H offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA4677 (Xeon Gold 6416H) and C621 (Xeon W-3275).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6416H | Xeon W-3275 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+50% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+300% | 1024 |
| RAM Channels | 8+33% | 6 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 80+25% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6416H rivals EPYC 9254; Xeon W-3275 rivals Threadripper 3970X.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6416H | Xeon W-3275 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Gold 6416H launched at $1845 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3275 debuted at $4449.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6416H | Xeon W-3275 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1845-59% | $4449 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $1550 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon Gold 6416H and Xeon W-3275
