EPYC 7313P vs Xeon Gold 6416H

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7313P

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2021

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Gold 6416H

18 Cores36 Thrd165 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7313P vs Xeon Gold 6416H Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7313P

16 / 32

41,017

+1.0%

Ryzen 7 6800H

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon Gold 6416H

18 / 36

40,606

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7313P vs Xeon Gold 6416H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7313P vs Xeon Gold 6416H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7313P

2021

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅+184.4% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 45 MB).
✅Costs $932 less on MSRP ($913 MSRP vs $1,845 MSRP).
✅Delivers 104.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 22.0 PassMark/$ ($913 MSRP vs $1,845 MSRP).
✅Draws 155W instead of 165W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6416H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6416H moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Gold 6416H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (40,606 vs 41,017).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (45 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.0 vs 44.9 PassMark/$ ($1,845 MSRP vs $913 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7313P better than Xeon Gold 6416H?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6416H is ahead with a 13.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7313P pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark. EPYC 7313P also has the bigger cache pool with 184.4% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 45 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7313P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 184.4% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 45 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7313P is the better buy right now. EPYC 7313P comes in $932 cheaper on MSRP at $913 MSRP versus $1,845 MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6416H is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 13.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 104.1% better value on MSRP (44.9 vs 22.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6416H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7313P vs Xeon Gold 6416H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7313P

The EPYC 7313P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,017 points. Launch price was $913.

Xeon Gold 6416H

The Xeon Gold 6416H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,606 points. Launch price was $1,444.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7313P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6416H offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon Gold 6416H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7313P versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6416H — a 12.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6416H (base: 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 7313P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon Gold 6416H uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7313P scores 41,017 against the Xeon Gold 6416H's 40,606 — a 1% lead for the EPYC 7313P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7313P vs 45 MB on the Xeon Gold 6416H.

Feature	EPYC 7313P	Xeon Gold 6416H
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	18 / 36+13%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4.2 GHz+14%
Base Clock	3 GHz+36%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+184%	45 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm+	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	41,017+1%	40,606

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7313P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6416H uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7313P versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6416H — the Xeon Gold 6416H supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7313P) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6416H) — the EPYC 7313P offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7313P) and LGA4677 (Xeon Gold 6416H).

Feature	EPYC 7313P	Xeon Gold 6416H
Socket	SP3	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7313P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6416H). Direct competitor: EPYC 7313P rivals Xeon Gold 6334; Xeon Gold 6416H rivals EPYC 9254.

Feature	EPYC 7313P	Xeon Gold 6416H
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7313P was priced at $913, while the Xeon Gold 6416H came in at $1845. On launch pricing ($913 vs $1845), EPYC 7313P was $932 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7313P delivers 44.9 pts/$ vs 22.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6416H — making the EPYC 7313P the 68.5% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7313P	Xeon Gold 6416H
MSRP	$913-51%	$1845
Performance per Dollar	44.9+104%	22.0
Release Date	2021	2023

Search EPYC 7313P on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6416H on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.