
Xeon L5639

Xeon X5647
Xeon L5639 vs Xeon X5647 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon L5639 vs Xeon X5647 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Civilization VI
Xeon L5639 vs Xeon X5647: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon L5639
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 130W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,419 vs 4,441).
Xeon X5647
2011Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌116.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 60W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon X5647 better than Xeon L5639?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon L5639 vs Xeon X5647 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon L5639
The Xeon L5639 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.133 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,419 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon X5647
The Xeon X5647 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,441 points. Launch price was $175.
Processing Power
The Xeon L5639 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon X5647 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon L5639 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Xeon L5639 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon X5647 — a 18.1% clock advantage for the Xeon X5647 (base: 2.133 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). Both are built on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon L5639 scores 4,419 against the Xeon X5647's 4,441 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon X5647. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Xeon L5639 | Xeon X5647 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 2.67 GHz | 3.2 GHz+20% |
| Base Clock | 2.133 GHz | 2.93 GHz+37% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 4,419 | 4,441 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1366 socket with PCIe 4.0.
| Feature | Xeon L5639 | Xeon X5647 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1366 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1066 |
| RAM Channels | — | 3 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon L5639) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon X5647). Primary use case: Xeon X5647 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5647 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Xeon L5639 | Xeon X5647 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













