Xeon Platinum 8352M vs EPYC 7402P
Xeon Platinum 8352M
EPYC 7402P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8352M
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7402P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8352M | EPYC 7402P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,471) | ✅ More affordable ($1,090) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake-SP (2021) / 10 nm) | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8352M | EPYC 7402P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+304%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,471) | ✅ More affordable ($1,090) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8352M and EPYC 7402P
Xeon Platinum 8352M
The Xeon Platinum 8352M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 44,406 points. Launch price was $800.
EPYC 7402P
The EPYC 7402P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 43,759 points. Launch price was $1,250.
Processing Power
The Xeon Platinum 8352M packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 7402P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8352M has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352M versus 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7402P — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8352M (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8352M uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 7402P uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8352M scores 44,406 against the EPYC 7402P's 43,759 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8352M. L3 cache: 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8352M vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7402P.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8352M | EPYC 7402P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+33% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+4% | 3.35 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.8 GHz+22% |
| L3 Cache | 48 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 44,406+1% | 43,759 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Platinum 8352M uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7402P uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352M) vs 128 (EPYC 7402P) — the EPYC 7402P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352M) and SP3 (EPYC 7402P).
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8352M | EPYC 7402P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 128+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8352M) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7402P). Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8352M rivals EPYC 7543; EPYC 7402P rivals Xeon Gold 6248.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8352M | EPYC 7402P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Platinum 8352M launched at $4471 MSRP, while the EPYC 7402P debuted at $1280. At current prices ($4471 vs $1090), the EPYC 7402P is $3381 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8352M delivers 9.9 pts/$ vs 40.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 7402P — making the EPYC 7402P the 120.7% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8352M | EPYC 7402P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4471 | $1280-71% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4471 | $1090-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.9 | 40.1+305% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon Platinum 8352M and EPYC 7402P
