Xeon Platinum 8352M vs Xeon Silver 4416+

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Platinum 8352M vs Xeon Silver 4416+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Platinum 8352M vs Xeon Silver 4416+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Platinum 8352M

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+28% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 38 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 37.2 PassMark/$ ($4,471 MSRP vs $1,186 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4416+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Silver 4416+

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,285 less on MSRP ($1,186 MSRP vs $4,471 MSRP).
✅Delivers 274.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.2 vs 9.9 PassMark/$ ($1,186 MSRP vs $4,471 MSRP).
✅Draws 165W instead of 185W, a 20W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8352M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (44,140 vs 44,406).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (38 MB vs 48 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8352M better than Xeon Silver 4416+?

Yes. Xeon Platinum 8352M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8352M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8352M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 28% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 38 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8352M is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Silver 4416+ is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Platinum 8352M comes in 277.0% more expensive on MSRP at $4,471 MSRP versus $1,186 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Silver 4416+ is also 274.7% better value on MSRP (37.2 vs 9.9 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4416+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon Platinum 8352M vs Xeon Silver 4416+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Platinum 8352M

The Xeon Platinum 8352M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 44,406 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Silver 4416+

The Xeon Silver 4416+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4000. Passmark benchmark score: 44,140 points. Launch price was $1,186.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8352M packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4416+ offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8352M has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352M versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4416+ — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Xeon Silver 4416+ (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8352M uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4416+ uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8352M scores 44,406 against the Xeon Silver 4416+'s 44,140 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8352M. L3 cache: 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8352M vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon Silver 4416+.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8352M	Xeon Silver 4416+
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+60%	20 / 40
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	3.9 GHz+11%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+15%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	48 MB (total)+28%	37.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	10 nm	10 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake-SP (2021)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	44,406	44,140

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Platinum 8352M uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4416+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8352M versus 4800 on the Xeon Silver 4416+ — the Xeon Silver 4416+ supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352M) vs 80 (Xeon Silver 4416+) — the Xeon Silver 4416+ offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352M) and C741 (Xeon Silver 4416+).

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8352M	Xeon Silver 4416+
Socket	LGA4189	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	64	80+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8352M rivals EPYC 7543; Xeon Silver 4416+ rivals EPYC 9254.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8352M	Xeon Silver 4416+
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Platinum 8352M was priced at $4471, while the Xeon Silver 4416+ came in at $1186. On launch pricing ($4471 vs $1186), Xeon Silver 4416+ was $3285 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8352M delivers 9.9 pts/$ vs 37.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Silver 4416+ — making the Xeon Silver 4416+ the 115.7% better value option.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8352M	Xeon Silver 4416+
MSRP	$4471	$1186-73%
Performance per Dollar	9.9	37.2+276%
Release Date	2021	2023

Search Xeon Platinum 8352M on Amazon

Search Xeon Silver 4416+ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.