Xeon Platinum 8352M vs Xeon w5-3525

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Platinum 8352M vs Xeon w5-3525 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Platinum 8352M vs Xeon w5-3525: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Platinum 8352M

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 185W instead of 290W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-3525 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (44,406 vs 45,311).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 33.8 PassMark/$ ($4,471 MSRP vs $1,339 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon w5-3525 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w5-3525

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,132 less on MSRP ($1,339 MSRP vs $4,471 MSRP).
✅Delivers 240.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 33.8 vs 9.9 PassMark/$ ($1,339 MSRP vs $4,471 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅75% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌56.8% higher power demand at 290W vs 185W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w5-3525 better than Xeon Platinum 8352M?

Yes. Xeon w5-3525 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 13.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w5-3525 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w5-3525 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w5-3525 is the better buy right now. Xeon w5-3525 comes in $3,132 cheaper on MSRP at $1,339 MSRP versus $4,471 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 240.7% better value on MSRP (33.8 vs 9.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w5-3525 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 32/64. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon Platinum 8352M vs Xeon w5-3525 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Platinum 8352M

The Xeon Platinum 8352M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 44,406 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon w5-3525

The Xeon w5-3525 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 45,311 points. Launch price was $1,339.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8352M packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon w5-3525 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8352M has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352M versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w5-3525 — a 31.3% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-3525 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8352M uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon w5-3525 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8352M scores 44,406 against the Xeon w5-3525's 45,311 — a 2% lead for the Xeon w5-3525. L3 cache: 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8352M vs 45 MB on the Xeon w5-3525.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8352M	Xeon w5-3525
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+100%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	4.8 GHz+37%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3.2 GHz+39%
L3 Cache	48 MB (total)+7%	45 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	10 nm	Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture	Ice Lake-SP (2021)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	44,406	45,311+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Platinum 8352M uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w5-3525 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8352M versus 4800 on the Xeon w5-3525 — the Xeon w5-3525 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352M) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3525) — the Xeon w5-3525 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352M) and W790 (Xeon w5-3525).

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8352M	Xeon w5-3525
Socket	LGA4189	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	64	112+75%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w5-3525 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8352M rivals EPYC 7543; Xeon w5-3525 rivals Threadripper PRO 7955WX.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8352M	Xeon w5-3525
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Platinum 8352M was priced at $4471, while the Xeon w5-3525 came in at $1339. On launch pricing ($4471 vs $1339), Xeon w5-3525 was $3132 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8352M delivers 9.9 pts/$ vs 33.8 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-3525 — making the Xeon w5-3525 the 109.2% better value option.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8352M	Xeon w5-3525
MSRP	$4471	$1339-70%
Performance per Dollar	9.9	33.8+241%
Release Date	2021	2024

Search Xeon Platinum 8352M on Amazon

Search Xeon w5-3525 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.