
Xeon Platinum 8352M vs Xeon w5-3525

Xeon Platinum 8352M

Xeon w5-3525
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8352M
Performance Per Dollar Xeon w5-3525
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8352M | Xeon w5-3525 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,471) | ✅ More affordable ($1,392) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake-SP (2021) / 10 nm) | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8352M | Xeon w5-3525 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+228%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,471) | ✅ More affordable ($1,392) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8352M and Xeon w5-3525

Xeon Platinum 8352M
The Xeon Platinum 8352M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 44,406 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon w5-3525
The Xeon w5-3525 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 45,311 points. Launch price was $1,339.
Processing Power
The Xeon Platinum 8352M packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon w5-3525 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8352M has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352M versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w5-3525 — a 31.3% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-3525 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8352M uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon w5-3525 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8352M scores 44,406 against the Xeon w5-3525's 45,311 — a 2% lead for the Xeon w5-3525. L3 cache: 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8352M vs 45 MB on the Xeon w5-3525.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8352M | Xeon w5-3525 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+100% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.8 GHz+37% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.2 GHz+39% |
| L3 Cache | 48 MB (total)+7% | 45 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 44,406 | 45,311+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Platinum 8352M uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w5-3525 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8352M versus 4800 on the Xeon w5-3525 — the Xeon w5-3525 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352M) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3525) — the Xeon w5-3525 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352M) and W790 (Xeon w5-3525).
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8352M | Xeon w5-3525 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 112+75% |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w5-3525 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8352M rivals EPYC 7543; Xeon w5-3525 rivals Threadripper PRO 7955WX.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8352M | Xeon w5-3525 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Platinum 8352M launched at $4471 MSRP, while the Xeon w5-3525 debuted at $1339. At current prices ($4471 vs $1392), the Xeon w5-3525 is $3079 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8352M delivers 9.9 pts/$ vs 32.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-3525 — making the Xeon w5-3525 the 106.5% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8352M | Xeon w5-3525 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4471 | $1339-70% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4471 | $1392-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.9 | 32.6+229% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















